The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of Social Validation Procedures in Intervention Research With Transition-Age Autistic Youth
Open accessAbstract
In this secondary analysis of a previously conducted systematic review, we analyze social validity assessments in intervention research for transition-age autistic youth. Social validity is concerned with the acceptability of the intervention goals, the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention procedures, and the perceived importance of the intervention outcomes. We found that although just over half of intervention studies assessed some aspect of social validity, only 43% of those studies examined all three dimensions. There were several shortcomings of the social validation procedures, including a lack of psychometric validation for quantitatively scored questionnaires and a failure to describe qualitative procedures for analyzing open-ended questions. These shortcomings likely explain why interpretations of social validity assessments were nearly universally positive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This approach risks imposing normative standards on autistic individuals, disregarding the principles of neurodiversity(Bottema-Beutel, Crowley LaPoint, et al., 2023; Bottema-Beutel, Sandbank, & Woynaroski, 2023).”
From Rethinking psychological interventions in autism: Toward a neurodiversity‐affirming approach. (2025) · cites this paper as Bottema-Beutel, Crowley LaPoint, et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290507100203 · Cited by 3,368
Wolf, M. M. (1978) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203 · Cited by 3,176
Bergen, N., & Labonté, R. (2020) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732319889354 · Cited by 1,558
Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers
Bottema-Beutel, K., Kapp, S. K., Lester, J. N., Sasson, N. J., & Hand, B. N. (2021) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2020.0014 · Cited by 1,251
Self-citationAssessing the Clinical or Applied Importance of Behavior Change through Social Validation
Kazdin, A. E. (1977) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/014544557714001 · Cited by 1,117
SOCIAL VALIDITY ASSESSMENTS: IS CURRENT PRACTICE STATE OF THE ART?
Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189 · Cited by 730
Understanding the reasons, contexts and costs of camouflaging for autistic adults
Cage, E., & Troxell-Whitman, Z. (2019) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-03878-x · Cited by 661 · cited 1×
“Central to these critiques are that many intervention goals aim to teach autistic youth to pass as nonautistic, which can have negative mental health implications (Cage & Troxell-Whitman, 2019).”
BackgroundProject AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children.
Sandbank, M., Bottema-Beutel, K., Crowley, S., Cassidy, M., Dunham, K., Feldman, J. I., Crank, J., Albarran, S. A., Raj, S., Mahbub, P., et al. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000215 · Cited by 606
Self-citationKeating, C. T., Hickman, L., Leung, J., Monk, R., Montgomery, A. K., Heath, H., & Sowden, S. (2022) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2864 · Cited by 340
Broer, S. M., Doyle, M. B., & Giangreco, M. F. (2005) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290507100401 · Cited by 241
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Carter S. L., Wheeler J. L. (2019). The social validity manual: Subjective evaluation of interventions (2nd ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.
- 10.1177/2165143412443082 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315150666 · DOI · Paper page
- Martin R. (1975). Legal challenges to behavior modification: Trends in schools, corrections, and mental health. Research Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking psychological interventions in autism: Toward a neurodiversity‐affirming approach.
Graf‐Kurtulus, S., & Gelo, O. C. G. (2025) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12874 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bottema-Beutel, K., Crowley LaPoint, S., Kim, S. Y., Mohiuddin, S., Yu, Q., & McKinnon, R.
- Affiliations
- Boston College
- Duksung Women's University (KR)
- Boston College (US)
- Venue
- Exceptional Children
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-04-19
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-202
- ISSN
- 0014-4029 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5560
- OpenAlex
- W4366488542
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- social validity, autistic youth, transition-age youth, intervention research, treatment acceptability, intervention feasibility, psychometric validation, questionnaire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
