The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When Some is Not Better Than None: Effects of Differential Implementation of Curriculum-Based Measurement
Abstract
This study explored the effect of differential implementation of curriculum-based measurement (CBM) on math computation achievement of students with mild disabilities. In addition, selected variables associated with the quality with which teachers implement CBM were examined. Twenty-nine special education teachers each monitored two students with mild disabilities in math computation using CBM for 16 weeks. Results indicated that students whose teachers implemented CBM more accurately made significantly greater math gains than did students whose teachers (a) implemented CBM less accurately and (b) did not use CBM. Adequacy of planning time was associated with the quality of CBM implementation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Two factors appear particularly influential in how well teachers implement CBM: adequacy of planning time and teachers' degrees of personal and/or teaching efficacy [196].”
From Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present (2013) · cites this paper as [196]
In the citing paper
“teachers with high personal efficacy and high teaching efficacy increased the end-of-year goal for students more often than their counterparts with low degrees of efficacy; teachers with high teaching efficacy set goals that were overall more ambitious than those of teachers with low teaching efficacy”
From Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present (2013) · cites this paper as [196]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Allinder R. M., 1994, Teachers' attitudes regarding curriculum-based measurement: Results of a structured interview study
- 10.1080/02796015.1995.12085768 · DOI · Paper page
- Borg W. R., 1989, Educational research: An introduction
- 10.1177/088840648801100305 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543050002273 · DOI
- 10.1177/088840649101400301 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440298505200303 · DOI · Paper page
- Deno S. L., 1989, Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children, 1
- 10.17161/fec.v19i8.7497 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220671.1988.10885838 · DOI
- Fuchs L. S., 1989, Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children, 153
- Fuchs L. S., 1992, School Organization Contexts Profile
- 10.1177/074193258901000209 · DOI
- 10.1080/02796015.1991.12085532 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440299205800507 · DOI
- 10.1177/016264348700800402 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312028003617 · DOI
- Fuchs L. S., 1990, Monitoring Basic Skills Progress [Computer programs]
- 10.1177/016264348800900202 · DOI
- Fullan M. G., 1990, Educational Leadership, 48, 13
- 10.1080/0141192810070103 · DOI
- Howell K. W., 1993, Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making
- 10.1177/002221947400701002 · DOI
- 10.1177/088840648801100102 · DOI
- Lipsey M. W., 1990, Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research
- Louis K. S., 1990, Teachers and their workplace, 23
- Marston D. B., 1989, Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children, 18
- 10.1080/02796015.1987.12085286 · DOI
- 10.1086/461484 · DOI
- Rosenshine B., 1971, Teaching behaviors and student achievement
- 10.3102/00028312019002220 · DOI
- Tindal G., 1989, Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children, 202
- 10.2307/1510260 · DOI
- 10.1177/074193258400500505 · DOI
- Witt J. C., 1985, Advances in school psychology, 251
Cited by
Effects of data–based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta–analysis
Jung, P., McMaster, K. L., Kunkel, A. K., Shin, J., & Stecker, P. M. (2018) · Learning Disabilities Research & Practice · doi:10.1111/ldrp.12172 · Cited by 121
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present
Tindal, G. (2013) · ISRN Education · doi:10.1155/2013/958530 · Cited by 59
“Again, in a related and later study, Allinder et al. [199] studied self-monitoring with CBM versus CBM alone.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Allinder, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allinder, Rose M.
- Venue
- Exceptional Children
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 525-535
- ISSN
- 0014-4029 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5560
- OpenAlex
- W1954935411
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- curriculum-based measurement, implementation fidelity, mild disabilities, special education teachers, teacher planning time, student monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
