Cited by 35Biblical Studies and InterpretationClassical Antiquity StudiesByzantine Studies and History

The date of Ignatius

Barnes, Timothy D.·2008·The Expository Times

Abstract

The present article seeks to transcend the terms of the traditional debate over the date and authenticity of the Ignatian letters by showing that Ignatius knew the writings of the Gnostic Ptolemaeus. Since Eusebius' dating of Ignatius to the reign of Trajan (98—117) cannot be regarded as authoritative, it is suggested that the letters were probably written in the 140s.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0014524608098730

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to prevailing Second Temple mythologies, demons originated as the evil spirits of primordial giants, who were themselves the offspring of fallen angelic "Watchers" and their female mortal paramours.

    “According to prevailing Second Temple mythologies, demons originated as the evil spirits of primordial giants, who were themselves the offspring of fallen angelic “Watchers” and their female mortal paramours.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, T. D.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Barnes, Timothy D.
Venue
The Expository Times
Published
2008-12
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
119-130
ISSN
  • 0014-5246 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-5308
OpenAlex
W1982190190
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Expository Times (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
Keywords
Ignatius of Antioch, authenticity, Gnosticism, Eusebius of Caesarea, Trajan, early Christianity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review