Qualitative methods in health promotion research: some criteria for quality
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The qualitative paradigm is based on interpretivism and constructivism.
“In contrast, the qualitative paradigm is based on interpretivism (Altheide and Johnson, 1994; Kuzel and Like, 1991; Secker et al., 1995) and constructivism (Guba and Lincoln, 1994).”
From Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research (2002) · cites this paper as Secker et al., 1995
Cites
The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants
Kitzinger, J. (1994) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023 · Cited by 3,870 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
Mays, N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 · Cited by 3,742 · see citing works
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107 · see citing works
Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1023/a:1014301607592 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies
Boulton, M., Fitzpatrick, R., & Swinburn, C. (1996) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00041.x · Cited by 109 · see citing works
How to assess rigour... or not in qualitative papers
Sale, J. E. M. (2008) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01093.x · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Secker, J., Wimbush, E., Watson, J., & Milburn, K.
- Affiliations
- Development and Evaluation Division, Health Education Board for Scotland
- ORCID
- Watson, Jonathan
- Venue
- Health Education Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-87
- ISSN
- 0017-8969 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-8176
- OpenAlex
- W2093768816
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 49.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Education Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Keywords
- qualitative research, health promotion research, research quality criteria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
