The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complacency and Automation Bias in the Use of Imperfect Automation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examine the effects of two different kinds of decision-aiding automation errors on human-automation interaction (HAI), occurring at the first failure following repeated exposure to correctly functioning automation. The two errors are incorrect advice, triggering the automation bias, and missing advice, reflecting complacency. BACKGROUND: Contrasts between analogous automation errors in alerting systems, rather than decision aiding, have revealed that alerting false alarms are more problematic to HAI than alerting misses are. Prior research in decision aiding, although contrasting the two aiding errors (incorrect vs. missing), has confounded error expectancy. METHOD: Participants performed an environmental process control simulation with and without decision aiding. For those with the aid, automation dependence was created through several trials of perfect aiding performance, and an unexpected automation error was then imposed in which automation was either gone (one group) or wrong (a second group). A control group received no automation support. RESULTS: The correct aid supported faster and more accurate diagnosis and lower workload. The aid failure degraded all three variables, but "automation wrong" had a much greater effect on accuracy, reflecting the automation bias, than did "automation gone," reflecting the impact of complacency. Some complacency was manifested for automation gone, by a longer latency and more modest reduction in accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Automation wrong, creating the automation bias, appears to be a more problematic form of automation error than automation gone, reflecting complacency. IMPLICATIONS: Decision-aiding automation should indicate its lower degree of confidence in uncertain environments to avoid the automation bias.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This risk is amplified by automation bias, the tendency to over-rely on algorithmic output, by leading clinicians to accept erroneous recommendations without adequate scrutiny.17-21”
From Automation Bias in Large Language Model Assisted Diagnostic Reasoning Among AI-Trained Physicians (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Endsley, M. R. (1995) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049543 · Cited by 8,875
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195
Self-citationComplacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration
Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720810376055 · Cited by 1,710 · cited 3×
“These two problems have been integrated by Parasuraman and Manzey (2010) into a common attentionbased framework.”
BackgroundPerformance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency'
Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0301_1 · Cited by 875
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., & Wickens, C. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1518/155534308x284417 · Cited by 729
Self-citationHuman Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis
Onnasch, L., Wickens, C. D., Li, H., & Manzey, D. (2014) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720813501549 · Cited by 524
Self-citationAutomation Bias: Decision Making and Performance in High-Tech Cockpits
Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. (1998) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0801_3 · Cited by 353
Dixon, S. R., & Wickens, C. (2006) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1518/001872006778606822 · Cited by 329
Self-citationAccountability and automation bias
SKITKA, L. J., MOSIER, K., & BURDICK, M. D. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0349 · Cited by 324
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mosier K., 1996, Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, 201
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–176 of 176
Su, J., Wang, Z., Qiang, Z., & Wang, Z. (2026) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence14080182 · Cited by 9
Trust and Dependence on Robotic Decision Support
Natarajan, M., & Gombolay, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2024.3484628 · Cited by 5
Russinovich, M., Salem, A., Zanella-Béguelin, S., & Zunger, Y. (2025) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3749447 · Cited by 5
Human-Centered Work Design for the Internet of Production
Baier, R., Brauner, P., Brillowski, F., Dammers, H., Liehner, G. L., Pütz, S., Schneider, S., Schollemann, A., Steuer-Dankert, L., Vervier, L., et al. (2023) · Interdisciplinary excellence accelerator series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44497-5_19 · Cited by 4
Visual attention allocation between robotic arm and environmental process control
Wickens, C. D., Vieane, A. Z., Clegg, B. A., Sebok, A. L., & Janes, J. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591135 · Cited by 5
Self-citationRussinovich, M., Salem, A., Zanella-Béguelin, S., & Zunger, Y. (2024) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3711679 · Cited by 3
Turchi, T., Mikhaylova, D., Troccoli, M., Malizia, A., Cimino, M. G. C. A., Galatolo, F. A., Mantia, G. L., Campisi, G., & Fede, O. D. (2025) · Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly) · doi:10.1145/3750069.3750072 · Cited by 3
Lin, J., Li, Q., Zhang, K., & Zhang, C. (2025) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-16859 · Cited by 3
Yu, X., He, L., Qin, J., & Liu, T. (2026) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2026.103942 · Cited by 3
Modeling the Interplay between Human Trust and Monitoring
Zahedi, Z., Sreedharan, S., Verma, M., & Subbarao Kambhampati, B. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889475 · Cited by 3
Predicting Trust Dynamics Type Using Seven Personal Characteristics
Chung, H., & Yang, X. J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2025.3627578 · Cited by 3
Meyer, J., Dembinsky, O., & Raviv, T. (2020) · Computers & security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101944 · Cited by 2
Measuring Perceived Agent Appropriateness in a Live-Flight Human-Autonomy Teaming Scenario
Lyons, J. B., Highland, P., Bos, N., Lyons, D., Skinner, A. D., Schnell, T., & Hefron, R. G. (2022) · Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications · doi:10.1177/10648046221129393 · Cited by 3
Method for Generating Expert Derived Confidence Scores
Fallon, C. K., & Yin, T. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192240 · Cited by 3
Digital Governance and Neoliberalism: The Evolution of Machine Learning in Australian Public Policy
Jobberns, H., & Guihot, M. (2024) · Law Technology and Humans · doi:10.5204/lthj.3408 · Cited by 3
Szilagyi, K., Millar, J., Moon, A., & Rismani, S. (2023) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-023-00066-y · Cited by 2
Chapa, J. O. (2024) · Journal of Military Ethics · doi:10.1080/15027570.2024.2439654 · Cited by 2
Bowden, V. K., Gegoff, I., Kilpatrick, P., & Loft, S. D. (2025) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208251335536 · Cited by 2
ALGORITHMS AND JUSTICE: AN ERA OF UNCERTAINTY AND DOUBT
Basu, N., & Dave, R. (2024) · ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts · doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i3.2024.5268 · Cited by 2
Human system patterns for interaction and cooperation of automated vehicles and humans
Flemisch, F. O., Usai, M., Weßel, G., & Herzberger, N. D. (2023) · at - Automatisierungstechnik · doi:10.1515/auto-2022-0160 · Cited by 2
Human-Centered Work Design for the Internet of Production
Baier, R., Brauner, P., Brillowski, F., Dammers, H., Liehner, G. L., Pütz, S., Schneider, S., Schollemann, A., Steuer-Dankert, L., Vervier, L., et al. (2023) · Interdisciplinary excellence accelerator series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98062-7_19-1 · Cited by 2
Human-Autonomy Teaming in the Battlespace: Trust and The Role of Neuroimaging
Palmer, S., Richards, D., & Shelton-Rayner, G. K. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) · doi:10.1109/ichms59971.2024.10555777 · Cited by 2
Exploring Connections Between Team Process and Automation Error Management
Dong, X., & Li, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2382517 · Cited by 2
Stampf, A., Colley, M., Knuth, A.-K., Tasci, C., & Rukzio, E. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3678511 · Cited by 2
Bahodi, M.-T., van Berkel, N., Skov, M. B., & Merritt, T. (2024) · TAS · doi:10.1145/3686038.3686069 · Cited by 4
A Critical Investigation of Rationalities in Automation with BPM
Klessascheck, F., Bein, L., Haase, J., & Pufahl, L. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Business Informatics · doi:10.1109/cbi62504.2024.00014 · Cited by 2
Fallon, C. K., Jefferson, B. A., & Andersen, E. S. (2022) · Resilience Week (RWS) · doi:10.1109/rws55399.2022.9984018 · Cited by 2
van de Merwe, K., Mallam, S., Engelhardtsen, Ø., & Nazir, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4500415 · Cited by 2
Individual differences in multi-tasking ability moderate the benefits of using low-degree automation
Greenwell-Barnden, J. N., Loft, S. D., Bowden, V. K., Bender, A. D., Whitney, S. J., Lipp, O. V., & Visser, T. A. W. (2025) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2024.2446848 · Cited by 1
Impact of LLM assistance on physician decision-making: a multi-country randomized controlled trial
Rounding, N., Arif, L. S., Berg, J., Cals, J., de Boer, D. P., de Bont, E. G. P. M., Dijksman, S., Findyartini, A., Fouarge, D. J. A. G., Fregin, M.-C., et al. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-03111-5 · Cited by 1
Manger, C., Vogl, A., & Riener, A. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app152011030 · Cited by 1
Is ChatGPT detrimental to innovation? A field experiment among university students
Hassan, M., Amin, E., Mansour, S., & Kelani, Z. (2026) · Seikei ronsō/Review of economics and political science · doi:10.1108/reps-08-2024-0045 · Cited by 2
Greenwell-Barnden, J., Visser, T. A. W., Loft, S., Whitney, S. J., & Bowden, V. K. (2026) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/00187208261431968 · Cited by 1
The Pseudo-Confidence Paradox: The Epistemic Gap in Everyday AI Use
Kurmanbayeva, L. T., Tanabayeva, A., Doszhanova, A. I., Shashayeva, G. K., Bakarassov, D., & Knar, E. (2026) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies11030097 · Cited by 1
Circadian Effects on Simple Components of Complex Task Performance
Clegg, B. A., Wickens, C. D., Vieane, A. Z., Gutzwiller, R. S., & Sebok, A. L. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591137 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCrompton, L. (2022) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09153-7_11 · Cited by 1
Driver Alerting in ADAS-Equipped Cars: A Field Study
Cummings, M. L., & Bauchwitz, B. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA) · doi:10.1109/icaa58325.2023.00012 · Cited by 1
The Relationship Between Individual Differences in Switching Performance and Task Engagement
Clegg, B. A., & Wickens, C. D. (2016) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213601067 · Cited by 1
Self-citationPublic administration risks in the migration sphere in the context of digital transformation
Ledeneva, V. Y., & Rakhmonov, A. K. (2020) · UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia) · doi:10.26425/2309-3633-2020-8-4-51-59 · Cited by 1
Bimodal Trust: High and Low Trust in Vehicle Automation Influence Response to Automation Errors
Kamaraj, A. V., Lee, J., Parker, J., Domeyer, J. E., Liu, S.-Y., & Lee, J. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231196244 · Cited by 1
Autonomy-Respectful E-Coaching Systems
Kamphorst, B. A. (2020) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/344 · Cited by 9
Govindarajan, S. (2022) · doi:10.33612/diss.233705619 · Cited by 3
The Impact of Transparency and Expert-Framing on Trust in Conversational AiPreprint
Wienrich, C., & Obremski, D. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4715193 · Cited by 1
Coyne, R., Hanlon, M. L. D., Smeaton, A. F., Corcoran, P., & Walsh, J. C. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4772734 · Cited by 2
Sebok, A. L., Wickens, C. D., & Sargent, R. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591136
Self-citationAdaptive Interaction Criteria for Future Remotely Piloted Aircraft
Alfredson, J. (2016) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41959-6_23
Designing Trustworthy Automation
Sethumadhavan, A. (2015) · Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications · doi:10.1177/1064804615609923
Coping with unreliable automation : content/format/form in the design of human-automation systems
Morar, N. (2019) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham)
Experience with Varied Levels of Automation Influences User Response Speed
Mahoney, L., & Houpt, J. W. (2020) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181320641388
Holder, E., & Motz, F. (2016) · Industrial and systems engineering · doi:10.1201/9781315370460-12
Coyne, R., Hanlon, M. L. D., Smeaton, A. F., Corcoran, P., & Walsh, J. C. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/cdgkx
Sustainable Assessment of Advanced Machine Intelligence in Clinical Safety
Asutosh, B., Sahoo, B., Sharma, V., & Al‐Jawahry, H. M. (2023) · International Conference for Technological Engineering and its Applications in Sustainable Development (ICTEASD) · doi:10.1109/icteasd57136.2023.10585002
Legler, F., & Bullinger, A. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Organizational Psychology · doi:10.3389/forgp.2025.1669782
Weerheijm, B., Giest, S. N., & Klievink, B. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102088 · Cited by 2
Pak, R., Rovira, E. M., & McLaughlin, A. C. (2026) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2026.2686284 · Cited by 2
Agent Transparency and Human Performance in the Context of Autonomous Collision Avoidance
van de Merwe, K., Nazir, S., Mallam, S., & Engelhardtsen, Ø. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12392-3_17
Grădinaru, C., Barbaros, M. C., & Grădinaru, I.-A. (2026) · Postdisciplinary studies in discourse · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07761-5_10
Human-factor vulnerabilities of automation in SOCs: A mixed-methods multigroup analysis
Tilbury, J., Flowerday, S., Bott, G. J., Chua, Y. T., Olson, E., & Foltz, B. (2026) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2026.104871 · Cited by 1
Research Automation in Healthcare: Scoping Review with ☸️SAIMSARA
SAIMSARA (2026) · SAIMSARA Journal · doi:10.62487/saimsaraed91d2be
Yin, T., Bilbrey, J. A., Brayfindley, E., Meagher, B., & Fallon, C. K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6637704
Artificiell vapenautonomi och dess mänsklighetsunderskott
Friman*, J. (2019) · Retfærd · doi:10.18261/ret.42.4.4
Zhao, Q., Li, T., Li, S., Pan, Y., Wang, H., & Liao, C. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107267
Inpatient Nurses’ Anticipatory Perspectives on Assistive Robots: Qualitative Study
Tan, M. W., Chan, T. L. T., & Taye, C. S. M. (2026) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/91106
Brunyé, T. T., Vartanian, O. A., & Lieberman, H. R. (2026) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2026.106462
Chen, X., Liu, Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, W., Tian, Y., Gao, Z., & Shen, M. (2026) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208261477486
Acharya, N., & Kar, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Future Transportation · doi:10.3389/ffutr.2026.1951756
Kim, J., & Yang, X. J. (2026) · Human Factors · doi:10.1177/00187208261491447
Cognitive Ergonomics in Robotics
Rosen, P. H., Heinold, E., Barresi, G., & Wischniewski, S. (2026) · Springer tracts in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19374-2_3
Safety Intelligence in Aviation: Thinking Outside the box
Kılıç, B. (2026) · Human factors in aviation and aerospace. · doi:10.26650/hfaa.2026.1965653
The Impact of Time Pressure on Perceptions of Difficulty in an Automation-Supported Task
Padilla, J. G., & Patton, C. E. (2026) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813261498766
Metadata
- Authors
- Wickens, C. D., Clegg, B. A., Vieane, A. Z., & Sebok, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Alion Science and Technology (United States) (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-04-17
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 728-739
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2010273961
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Keywords
- automation bias, complacency, human-automation interaction, diagnostic accuracy, workload, alert system, false alarms
- MeSH terms
- Automation, Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Mental Processes, Workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review