Cited by 82Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyMind wandering and attentionSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

On the nature of vigilance

Open access
Hancock, Peter A.·2017·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Abstract

Objective: I explore the origins, theoretical underpinnings, applications, and importance of vigilance in a world ever more dominated by semiautomated, automated, and autonomous machines. Background: The empirical genesis of vigilance is taken as a case study in the etiology of the application of the behavioral sciences to the human culture of technology. The subsequent taxonomic ordering and theoretical clarification of its causal antecedents are set in the overall context of contemporary human–machine systems research. Method: The methods exercised in this work are historical analysis and informational synthesis in combination with projected theoretical implications and impact. Results: The profile of evolution of the concept of vigilance is clarified and cast in the light of critical events, such as the promulgation of the vigilance taxonomy, its linkage to attentional resource theory, and the recognition that the attendant performance decrement is as indicative of iatrogenic sources as it is a shortfall or limitation of the observer’s processing capacity. Conclusion: Vigilance is alive and growing in importance. Understanding sustained attention will become ever more critical in the humanization of automation-dominated systems. Application: The application of vigilance is widespread and potentially ubiquitous for semiautomated, automated, and autonomous system interaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0018720816655240

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guided search is more vulnerable to vigilance decrements and attentional lapses with increasing time on task, number of simultaneous tasks, and operator's mental and physical fatigue.

    “Guided search is also more vulnerable to vigilance decrements and attentional lapses, which tend to occur with increasing time on task, the number of simultaneous tasks, and the operator's mental and physical fatigue [9 , 13-18] .”

    From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hancock, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Central Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Hancock, Peter A.
Venue
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2017-02
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
35-43
ISSN
  • 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-8181
OpenAlex
W2585841720
Cited by
82
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sustained attention, vigilance decrement, human-machine systems, automated systems, autonomous systems
MeSH terms
Arousal, Humans, Man-Machine Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review