The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Event-Related Brain Potential as an Index of Display-Monitoring Workload
Abstract
As an index of task workload, the possible advantages of the event-related brain potential (ERP) over traditional secondary task and physiological measures are described and previous efforts to validate the use of ERPs in this context are discussed. An experiment is then reported in which perceptual load, incurred by monitoring a simulated air-traffic-control display for discrete events, is assessed using (a) measures of the P300 component of ERPs elicited by auditory probe stimuli and (b) a reaction time secondary task. The ERP measures were found to reflect systematically differences in task workload and to covary closely with the reaction time measure. The results are discussed within the framework of a multidimensional conception of human processing resources and task workload.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
Self-citationPupil Diameter and Load on Memory
Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.154.3756.1583 · Cited by 1,617
Cited by
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Self-citationMultiple resources and performance prediction
Wickens, C. D. (2002) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220210123806 · Cited by 2,621
Self-citationOn the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity
Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201990559 · Cited by 1,766
Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510 · Cited by 1,678
Duncan, C. C., Barry, R. J., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P. T., Näätänen, R., Polich, J., Reinvang, I., & Van Petten, C. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045 · Cited by 1,191
Metadata
- Authors
- Isreal, J. B., Wickens, C. D., Chesney, G. L., & Donchin, E.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1980-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-224
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W1830540013
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Event-Related Brain Potential as an Index of Display-Monitoring Workload. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872088002200210
- The paper
- Isreal, J. B., Wickens, C. D., Chesney, G. L., & Donchin, E. (1980). The Event-Related Brain Potential as an Index of Display-Monitoring Workload. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088002200210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
