Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays

Tullis, Thomas S.·1981·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Abstract

Four different types of CRT display formats were evaluated in the context of a computer-based telephone line testing system. The formats considered were narrative, which used complete words and phrases; structured, which used a tabular format; black-and-white graphics, which used a schematic of the telephone line; and color graphics, which also used a schematic but added color coding. The evaluation measured speed and accuracy of the subjects' interpretation of the displays of test results. Accuracy did not significantly vary with format but speed did. Response times for both graphic formats were consistently shorter than those for the narrative format. With additional practice, however, response times for the structured format were just as short. There was no significant difference between response times for the black-and-white graphic and color graphic formats.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872088102300504

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Tullis, T. S.
Venue
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
1981-10
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
541-550
ISSN
  • 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-8181
OpenAlex
W2339197243
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872088102300504
The paper
Tullis, T. S. (1981). An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088102300504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.