Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Psychophysics of Workload: Why Bother with Subjective Measures?

Gopher, Daniel, Braune, Rolf·1984·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Abstract

Psychophysical functions describe the relationship between variations in the amplitude of a defined physical quantity and the psychological perception of these changes. Examples are brightness, loudness, and pain. The regularities of these relationships have been formulated into psychophysical laws. The measurement methodology of psychophysical scaling has been refined by the Harvard group led by S. S. Stevens, who proposed a power function as a general form for such laws. The main argument of the present article is that a similar scaling approach can be adapted to the measurement of workload and task demands based upon subjective estimates. The rationale is that these estimates, like other psychophysical judgments, reflect the individual's perception of the amount of processing resources that the subject invests to meet the demand imposed by a task. This approach was successfully applied to the assessment of 21 experimental conditions given to a group of 60 subjects. The paper discusses the main results of this effort and their implications to theory and application in human performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872088402600504

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bird, K. L. (1981). Subjective rating scales as a workload assessment technique. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Manual Control , Los Angeles.
  2. Braune, R., and Wickens, C. D. (1983, April). The functional age index: An objective decision criterion for the assessment of pilot performance capabilities. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 253–268). Columbus, Ohio; Department of Aviation Psychology.
  3. Derrick, W. (1981). The relationship between processing resource and subjective dimensions of operator workload. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 532–536). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. · doi:10.1177/1071181381025001136
  4. Hart, S. G., Childress, M. E., and Bortolussi, M. (1981). Defining the subjective experience of workload. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 527–531). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. · doi:10.1177/1071181381025001135
  5. Kahneman, D., 1973, Attention and effort
  6. 10.1007/978-1-4757-0884-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.214 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.3.214 · Paper page
  8. Posner, M. I., 1980, The nature of thought: Essays in the honor of D. O. Hebb
  9. Reid, G. B., Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society
  10. Sheridan, T. B., 1979, Towards the definition and measurement of the mental workload of transport pilots
  11. Stevens, S. S., 1966, American Scientist, 54, 385
  12. Underwood, G., 1979, Psychological issues
  13. Wickens, C. D. and Yeh, Y.Y. (1982). The dissociation of subjective rating and performance. In Proceedings, 1982 Annual Meeting of 1EEE Conference of Systems, Man and Cybernetics. (pp. 600–603). New York: IEEE.

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Gopher, D., & Braune, R.
Venue
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
1984-10
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
519-532
ISSN
  • 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-8181
OpenAlex
W1888386172
Cited by
280
References
9
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Psychophysics of Workload: Why Bother with Subjective Measures? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872088402600504
The paper
Gopher, D., & Braune, R. (1984). On the Psychophysics of Workload: Why Bother with Subjective Measures? Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088402600504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.