Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recommendations for Mental Workload Measurement in a Test and Evaluation Environment

Wierwille, W. W., Eggemeier, F. Thomas·1993·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Abstract

Research performed during the last decade on estimation of mental workload has resulted in a subset of techniques exhibiting global sensitivity. Other techniques have also been demonstrated to have sensitivity in particular applications and can be used for diagnostic purposes. This paper reviews techniques that have shown sufficient sensitivity and robustness to be used in test and evaluation. Topics such as time scale considerations, available documentation, and appropriate procedures are also discussed. Recommendations are then made for workload estimation in test and evaluation situations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872089303500205

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Wierwille, W. W., & Eggemeier, F. T.
Venue
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
1993-06
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
263-281
ISSN
  • 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-8181
OpenAlex
W2154828048
Cited by
295
References
41
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations for Mental Workload Measurement in a Test and Evaluation Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872089303500205
The paper
Wierwille, W. W., & Eggemeier, F. T. (1993). Recommendations for Mental Workload Measurement in a Test and Evaluation Environment. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.