Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney

Hofstede, Geert·2002·Human Relations

Abstract

Cet article est une reponse a Brendan McSweeney qui, dans les colonnes du n°1, du volume 55 de la presente revue (janvier 2002) avait adresse une critique virulente a l'ouvrage de Geert Hofstede Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values, paru en 1980. Une des principales critiques portait sur la validite des liens de causalite entre valeurs professionnelles et cultures nationales. En rappellant le caractere construit des variables etudiees, l'A. rappelle qu'il ne leur attribue pas de caractere de causalite absolue

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0018726702055011921

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Hofstede, G.
Venue
Human Relations
Published
2002-11-01
Volume
55
Issue
11
Pages
1355-1361
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 0000-0000
OpenAlex
W2107218184
Cited by
420
References
7
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0018726702055011921
The paper
Hofstede, G. (2002). Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055011921

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.