The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment
Open accessAbstract
This article summarizes the literature explaining workplace bullying and focuses on organizational antecedents of bullying. In order to understand better the logic behind bullying, a model discussing different explanations is put forward. Thus, explanations for and factors associated with bullying are classified into three groups, enabling structures or necessary antecedents (e.g. perceived power imbalances, low perceived costs, and dissatisfaction and frustration), motivating structures or incentives (e.g. internal competition, reward systems and expected benefits), and precipitating processes or triggering circumstances (e.g. downsizing and restructuring, organizational changes, changes in the composition of the work group). The article concludes that bullying is often an interaction between structures and processes from all three groupings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work.
Zapf, D. (1999) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/01437729910268669 · Cited by 790
Aquino, K., & Bradfield, M. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.525.15205 · Cited by 275
Cited by
Workplace Victimization: Aggression from the Target's Perspective
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703 · Cited by 731
SPENCE LASCHINGER, H. K., LEITER, M., DAY, A., & GILIN, D. (2009) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00999.x · Cited by 730
Destructive Leadership: A Theoretical Review, Integration, and Future Research Agenda
Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312471388 · Cited by 569
Concept Creep: Psychology's Expanding Concepts of Harm and Pathology
Haslam, N. (2016) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2016.1082418 · Cited by 538
Law, R., Dollard, M. F., Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2011) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.010 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Salin, D.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1213-1232
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2123456428
- Cited by
- 1,101
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 46.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00187267035610003
- The paper
- Salin, D. (2003). Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035610003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.