Cited by 152Social Capital and NetworksCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

Networks and social capital in the UK television industry: The weakness of weak ties

Antcliff, Valerie, Saundry, Richard, Stuart, Mark·2007·Human Relations

Abstract

Accounts of the shift to post-industrial modes of employment have tended to present an over-simplified view of networks as an assemblage of contacts used to gain individual advantage in the labour market. Creative industries represent a challenge to this as typically they rely on networks to foster collaboration, trust and co-operation. In this article we explore how a variety of networks are used to promote both individual competition and co-operation in an industry where re-regulation has resulted in the break up of bureaucratic organizations and widespread casualization of the labour market. We argue that there is a need to extend the debate on the role of networks in a casualized labour market to examine how individuals organize themselves via the plethora of networks that result from organizational break up.We use qualitative data from a series of interviews with freelance television production workers in the United Kingdom to suggest that workers use networks as a source of competitive advantage and, at the same time, support and co-operation. Overall our research suggests that network activity is more complex, and networks themselves more dynamic, than existing research and theory implies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0018726707075880

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Freelance television production workers in the United Kingdom relied on networks to gain competitive advantages and foster collaborations.

    “Antcliff et al. (2007) interviewed freelance television production workers in the United Kingdom and found out that workers relied on networks to gain competitive advantages and foster collaborations.”

    From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Antcliff et al. (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antcliff, V., Saundry, R., & Stuart, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Antcliff, Valerie
  • Saundry, Richard
  • Stuart, Mark
Venue
Human Relations
Published
2007-02
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
371-393
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2120807257
Cited by
152
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
24.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Relations (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
social networks, social capital, television industry, creative industries, weak ties, casualisation, freelancers, organizational breakdown, competitive advantage, British television

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review