The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory
Open accessAbstract
This article critically analyses the manner in which intersectionality and related social positionality shape digital enterprise activities. Despite popular claims of meritocratic opportunity enactment within traditional forms of entrepreneurship, ascribed social characteristics intersect to influence the realization of entrepreneurial potential. However, it is purported that the emerging field of digital entrepreneurship may act as a ‘great leveller’ owing to perceived lower barriers to entry, disembodiment of the entrepreneurial actor and the absence of visible markers of disadvantage online. Using an interpretivist approach, we analyse empirical evidence that reveals how the privileges and disadvantages arising from intersecting social positions of gender, race and class status are experienced by UK women digital entrepreneurs. This analysis challenges the notion that the internet is a neutral platform for entrepreneurship and supports our thesis that offline inequality, in the form of marked bodies, social positionality and associated resource constraints, is produced and reproduced in the online environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903 · Cited by 20,808
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations
Acker, J. (2006) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243206289499 · Cited by 3,401
The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change
McRobbie, Á. (2008) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · Cited by 2,802
Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note
Bowen, G. A. (2008) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794107085301 · Cited by 2,749
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
Barbour, R. S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115 · Cited by 2,613
Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions
Ahl, H. (2006) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x · Cited by 2,036
On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life
Ahmed, S. (2012) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822395324 · Cited by 2,030
Cited by
Organizations and Societal Economic Inequality: A Review and Way Forward
Bapuji, H., Ertug, G., & Shaw, J. D. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0029 · Cited by 277
McAdam, M., Crowley, C., & Harrison, R. T. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.051 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Dy, A. M., Marlow, S., & Martin, L.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-20
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 286-311
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2396288568
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 53.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0018726716650730
- The paper
- Dy, A. M., Marlow, S., & Martin, L. (2017). A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716650730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.