Conventional vs. Worker-Owned Organizations
Abstract
Based on a sample of worker-owners in a producer cooperative and employees in a conventional organization, this study empirically tests portions of a theoretical model explaining the relationship between worker ownership and control and work attitudes and behaviors. According to the model, worker-owners in the cooperative are hypothesized to have higher perceptions of particiption in decision-making, pay equity, performance-reward contingencies, and group work norms than are employees in the conventional organization. These perceptions, in turn, are expected to lead to an increased commitment to the organization and lower levels of absenteeism, tardiness, accidents, grievances, and turnover. Results partially support the model with members of the cooperative being more committed to their organization, while at the same time having higher absenteeism and tardiness levels than employees in the conventional firm. Implications of results are presented, and directionsforfuture research are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four organizational forms of ownership-social ownership, cooperative ownership, trust ownership, and direct-share ownership-were found within the six local buyout cases.
“Four organizational forms of ownership, social ownership, cooperative ownership, trust ownership, and direct-share ownership (Beatty and Schachter 2002;Rhodes and Steers 1981), were found within the six local buyout cases.”
From Critical Analysis of the Relationship between Local Ownership and Community Resiliency* (2006) · cites this paper as Rhodes and Steers 1981
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049 · see citing works
Critical Analysis of the Relationship between Local Ownership and Community Resiliency*
Varghese, J., Krogman, N. T., Beckley, T. M., & Nadeau, S. (2006) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1526/003601106778070653 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rhodes, S. R., & Steers, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- University of Oregon (US)
- ORCID
- Steers, Richard M.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1013-1035
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2116158211
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 14.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Cooperative Studies and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
- Keywords
- employee ownership, worker cooperatives, employee commitment, absenteeism, tardiness, pay equity, labor standards, employee participation in decision-making, employee turnover, occupational accidents, grievances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review