Cited by 223Cooperative Studies and EconomicsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLabor Movements and Unions

Conventional vs. Worker-Owned Organizations

Rhodes, Susan R., Steers, Richard M.·1981·Human Relations

Abstract

Based on a sample of worker-owners in a producer cooperative and employees in a conventional organization, this study empirically tests portions of a theoretical model explaining the relationship between worker ownership and control and work attitudes and behaviors. According to the model, worker-owners in the cooperative are hypothesized to have higher perceptions of particiption in decision-making, pay equity, performance-reward contingencies, and group work norms than are employees in the conventional organization. These perceptions, in turn, are expected to lead to an increased commitment to the organization and lower levels of absenteeism, tardiness, accidents, grievances, and turnover. Results partially support the model with members of the cooperative being more committed to their organization, while at the same time having higher absenteeism and tardiness levels than employees in the conventional firm. Implications of results are presented, and directionsforfuture research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872678103401201

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four organizational forms of ownership-social ownership, cooperative ownership, trust ownership, and direct-share ownership-were found within the six local buyout cases.

    “Four organizational forms of ownership, social ownership, cooperative ownership, trust ownership, and direct-share ownership (Beatty and Schachter 2002;Rhodes and Steers 1981), were found within the six local buyout cases.”

    From Critical Analysis of the Relationship between Local Ownership and Community Resiliency* (2006) · cites this paper as Rhodes and Steers 1981

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhodes, S. R., & Steers, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Human Relations
Published
1981-12
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
1013-1035
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2116158211
Cited by
223
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Cooperative Studies and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
Keywords
employee ownership, worker cooperatives, employee commitment, absenteeism, tardiness, pay equity, labor standards, employee participation in decision-making, employee turnover, occupational accidents, grievances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review