The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look
Abstract
Although many organization researchers regard group cohesiveness as a key variable in their theorizing, the presumed importance of the cohesiveness construct has not always been accompanied by a corresponding emphasis on theoretical and empirical advances. This paper focuses primarily on the difficulties associated with the measurement of group cohesiveness, particularly as they pertain to the contentious relationship between group cohesiveness and productivity. Little is known for certain about this relationship in spite of four decades of investigation. One possible explanation for the inconclusive findings which characterize this literature is that no two studies reviewed here operationalized cohesiveness in exactly the same way. An emphasis on consistent and uniform measurement, and on the use of multiple measures of cohesiveness, should greatly improve the quality of future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Pressures in Informal Groups
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707362 · Cited by 1,831
Effects of Facilitative Role Interdependence on Group Functioning
Thomas, E. J. (1957) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675701000404 · Cited by 167
Cited by
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210 · Cited by 1,398
Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations.
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989 · Cited by 1,321
Kidwell, R. E., Mossholder, K. W., & Bennett, N. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300605 · Cited by 357
A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship
Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200401 · Cited by 243
Chiocchio, F., & Essiembre, H. (2009) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496409335103 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Mudrack, P. E.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 771-785
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2107639006
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872678904200902
- The paper
- Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678904200902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.