Switching Cognitive Gears: From Habits of Mind to Active Thinking
Abstract
The phrase "switching cognitive gears" is used to call attention to the fact that cognitive functioning involves the capacity to shift between cognitive modes, from automatic processing to conscious engagement and back again. Effectiveness may be as much a function of an actor's capacity to sense when a switch is appropriate, as to process in one or another mode. In this paper the authors develop a perspective on the switch from automatic to active thinking and the conditions that provoke it. They apply the perspective to work settings and identify types of situations in which actors are expected to switch from habits of mind to active thinking. They propose further work to develop a framework for understanding the switch from active thinking to automatic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When PEEIM is high, the transaction environment is protected and has low uncertainty; in such a certain and stable environment, people's ingrained cognitive script formed based on past experience can be activated automatically without conscious information processing.
“When PEEIM is high, the transaction environment is protected by high PEEIM and thus has low uncertainty. In such a certain and stable environment, peoples' 'ingrained cognitive script' is formed based on their past experience and can be activated automatically without conscious information processing e.g. automatic thinking (Kim et al. 2005; Louis and Sutton 1991).”
From Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanisms1 (2014) · cites this paper as Louis and Sutton 1991
When PEEIM is low, automatic reliance on prior experience can be interrupted by uncertain or discrepant situations because situational uncertainty may make customers question the applicability of past experience to new situations.
“On the contrary, when PEEIM is low (i.e., customers perceive the e-commerce environment to be uncertain), the automatic reliance on prior experience can be interrupted by the uncertain or discrepant situations because situational uncertainty may make customers question the applicability of the past experience to new situations (Louis and Sutton 1991).”
From Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanisms1 (2014) · cites this paper as Louis and Sutton 1991
To save cognitive effort, people tend to form a stable set of beliefs based on past experience which can be conveniently retrieved to infer new situations.
“To save cognitive effort, people tend to form a stable set of beliefs based on past experience which can be conveniently retrieved to infer new situations (Kim et al. 2005; Louis and Sutton 1991).”
From Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanisms1 (2014) · cites this paper as Louis and Sutton 1991
People tend to rely on their past experience to inform their assessments of current decisions, and the level of reliance depends on the certainty of the context.
“While people tend to rely on their past experience to inform their assessments of current decisions, the level of reliance depends on the certainty of the context.”
From Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanisms1 (2014) · cites this paper as Louis and Sutton 1991
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937 · see citing works
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196745 · Cited by 1,736 · see citing works
Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning
Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.003 · Cited by 1,054 · see citing works
Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation1
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148693 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., Sun, H., McCole, P., Ramsey, E., & Lim, K. H. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.2.04 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
A Longitudinal Study of Herd Behavior in the Adoption and Continued Use of Technology1
Sun, H. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.4.02 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Reconsidering the Trade-off Between Expertise and Flexibility: a Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective
Dane, E. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
O'Neill, B. S., & Adya, M. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710745969 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work
Watson‐Manheim, M. B., Chudoba, K. M., & Crowston, K. (2012) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00371.x · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Addas, S., & Pinsonneault, A. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12064 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Employment Ads: A Configurational Research Agenda
Rafaeli, A., & Oliver, A. L. (1998) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/105649269874009 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
‘Never heard of it’– understanding the public’s lack of awareness of a new electronic patient record
Bratan, T., Stramer, K., & Greenhalgh, T. (2010) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00608.x · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Louis, M. R., & Sutton, R. I.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-76
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2124815848
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 22.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- automatic processing, active thinking, cognitive modes, habits of mind, cognitive shifting, work environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review