Cited by 769Innovative Education and Learning PracticesHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyBehavioral Health and Interventions

Switching Cognitive Gears: From Habits of Mind to Active Thinking

Louis, Meryl Reis, Sutton, Robert I.·1991·Human Relations

Abstract

The phrase "switching cognitive gears" is used to call attention to the fact that cognitive functioning involves the capacity to shift between cognitive modes, from automatic processing to conscious engagement and back again. Effectiveness may be as much a function of an actor's capacity to sense when a switch is appropriate, as to process in one or another mode. In this paper the authors develop a perspective on the switch from automatic to active thinking and the conditions that provoke it. They apply the perspective to work settings and identify types of situations in which actors are expected to switch from habits of mind to active thinking. They propose further work to develop a framework for understanding the switch from active thinking to automatic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001872679104400104

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When PEEIM is high, the transaction environment is protected and has low uncertainty; in such a certain and stable environment, people's ingrained cognitive script formed based on past experience can be activated automatically without conscious information processing.

    “When PEEIM is high, the transaction environment is protected by high PEEIM and thus has low uncertainty. In such a certain and stable environment, peoples' 'ingrained cognitive script' is formed based on their past experience and can be activated automatically without conscious information processing e.g. automatic thinking (Kim et al. 2005; Louis and Sutton 1991).”
  • When PEEIM is low, automatic reliance on prior experience can be interrupted by uncertain or discrepant situations because situational uncertainty may make customers question the applicability of past experience to new situations.

    “On the contrary, when PEEIM is low (i.e., customers perceive the e-commerce environment to be uncertain), the automatic reliance on prior experience can be interrupted by the uncertain or discrepant situations because situational uncertainty may make customers question the applicability of the past experience to new situations (Louis and Sutton 1991).”
  • To save cognitive effort, people tend to form a stable set of beliefs based on past experience which can be conveniently retrieved to infer new situations.

    “To save cognitive effort, people tend to form a stable set of beliefs based on past experience which can be conveniently retrieved to infer new situations (Kim et al. 2005; Louis and Sutton 1991).”
  • People tend to rely on their past experience to inform their assessments of current decisions, and the level of reliance depends on the certainty of the context.

    “While people tend to rely on their past experience to inform their assessments of current decisions, the level of reliance depends on the certainty of the context.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Louis, M. R., & Sutton, R. I.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Human Relations
Published
1991-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
55-76
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2124815848
Cited by
769
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
FWCI
22.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
automatic processing, active thinking, cognitive modes, habits of mind, cognitive shifting, work environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review