The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response Rate in Academic Studies-A Comparative Analysis
Open accessAbstract
A study was conducted to explore what could and should be a reasonable response rate in academic studies. One hundred and forty-one papers which included 175 different studies were examined. They were published in the Academy of Management Journal, Human Relations, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, and Journal of International Business Studies in the years 1975, 1985, and 1995, covering about 200,000 respondents. The average response rate was 55.6 with a standard deviation of 19.7. Variations among the journals such as the year of publication and other variables were discussed. Most notable is the decline through the years (average 48.4, standard deviation of 20.1, in 1995), the lower level found in studies involving top management or organizational representatives (average 36.1, standard deviation of 13.3), and the predominance of North American studies. It is suggested that the average and standard deviation found in this study should be used as a norm for future studies, bearing in mind the specific reference group. It is also recommended that a distinction is made between surveys directed at individual participants and those targeting organizational representatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708094863 · Cited by 3,462
Self-citationWalking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do
Pager, D., & Quillian, L. (2005) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240507000301 · Cited by 640
Shift Work Disorder in Nurses – Assessment, Prevalence and Related Health Problems
Flo, E., Pallesen, S., Magerøy, N., Moen, B. E., Grønli, J., Hilde Nordhus, I., & Bjorvatn, B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033981 · Cited by 316
Longitudinal Study of Postconcussion Syndrome: Not Everyone Recovers
Hiploylee, C., Dufort, P. A., Davis, H. S., Wennberg, R. A., Tartaglia, M. C., Mikulis, D., Hazrati, L.-N., & Tator, C. H. (2017) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2016.4677 · Cited by 293
Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore
Tung, L. L., & Rieck, O. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.001 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Baruch, Y.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-438
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W4245013494
- Cited by
- 1,112
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response Rate in Academic Studies-A Comparative Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001872679905200401
- The paper
- Baruch, Y. (1999). Response Rate in Academic Studies-A Comparative Analysis. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.