Cited by 56Agricultural Economics and PracticesHistorical Economic and Social StudiesSocial and Economic Development in India

Official yields per acre in India, 1886–1947: some questions of interpretation

Heston, Alan W.·1973·The Indian Economic & Social History Review

Abstract

A main concern of historical studies of agriculture has been the trend in simple welfare measures like total and per capita production. These welfare measures are of particular importance for interpreting the economic history of India since 1880 because of the dominance of the agricultural sector. Over half the value of total output consisted of agricultural crops; further output per worker in agriculture is often taken as an approximation for trends in output per worker in other sectors, particularly services. Total and per capita production are affected by changes in acreage in all crops, change in acreage from lower to higher yielding crops, and changes in the yield of each crop. In this paper our concern is only with yields per acre in various crops, and not with changes in total acreage or crop composition, even though these latter two factors may be quantitatively more important in affecting agricultural output. However, the effects of acreage increases and changes in cropping patterns are in turn dependent on what yields per acre are assumed for the changed acreage, and cannot be properly assessed without knowledge of yield changes. It is generally accepted that yields per acre as well as total availability of food grains declined under the British during the period 1890-1947. Blyn (1966) has demonstrated that acceptance of official statistics on acreage and output in India means acceptance of a declining per capita availability of foodgrains. Blyn (1966 : 151) found the trend in yields to be -0.18% per year for foodgrains during *The research underlying this paper was done as a fellow of the American Institute of Indian Studies during the year !965-66. The author is indebted to the Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001946467301000401

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A concerted effort to systematically collect information on most crops in British India only began in 1891-92.

    “a concerted effort to systematically collect such information on most crops only began in 1891-92 (Heston, 1973).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heston, A. W.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Heston, Alan W.
Venue
The Indian Economic & Social History Review
Published
1973-10
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
303-332
ISSN
  • 0019-4646 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-0893
OpenAlex
W1983322145
Cited by
56
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Indian Economic & Social History Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Development in India
Keywords
agricultural production, per capita output, cropping pattern, British colonial rule, Indian economic history, welfare indicators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review