The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of the state in initiating development: A study of interwar South and Southeast Asia
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Between 1920 and 1930, the government of the Federated Malay States spent on average more than ten times the money spent in British India per head, Ceylon more than three times, the Philippines and Dutch East Indies more than double, and Siam and French Indochina 40-50 per cent more.
“Between 1920 and 1930, the government of the Federated Malay States spent on average more than ten times the money spent in British India per head, that of Ceylon spent more than three times, those of the Philippines and the Dutch East Indies more than double, and those of Siam and French Indochina 40-50 per cent more (Roy 1996).”
From THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA (1858-1947) (2016) · cites this paper as Roy 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA (1858-1947)
Roy, T. (2016) · Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0212610915000336 · Cited by 9
Self-citationStates and Development: Early Modern India, China, and the Great Divergence
Gupta, B., Ma, D., & Roy, T. (2016) · Studies in economic history · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1605-9_2 · Cited by 9
“…government of the Federated Malay States spent on average more than ten times the money spent in British India per head, that of Ceylon spent more than three times, those of the Philippines and the Dutch East Indies more than double, and those of Siam and French Indochina 40–50 % more (Roy 1996).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWhy Was British India a Limited State?
Roy, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108665001.003 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, T.
- Affiliations
- Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Roy, Tirthankar
- ORCID
- Roy, Tirthankar
- Venue
- The Indian Economic & Social History Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-401
- ISSN
- 0019-4646 (ISSN-L)
- 0973-0893
- OpenAlex
- W2010599859
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Indian Economic & Social History Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Asian Industrial and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
- Keywords
- role of the state, interwar period, South Asia, Southeast Asia, colonial economic policy, state-led development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
