Cited by 12Digital Economy and Work TransformationLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityLabor Law and Work Dynamics

The Impact of Client Nonpayment on the Income of Contingent Workers: Evidence from the Freelancers Union Independent Worker Survey

Rodgers, William M., Horowitz, Sara, Wuolo, Gabrielle·2014·ILR Review

Abstract

The authors use the Freelancers Union's annual Independent Worker Survey (IWS) from 2007 to 2011, the union's administrative membership file, and the American Community Survey to estimate the extent to which client nonpayment of independent workers is a problem and the ability of a written contract to reduce the odds of nonpayment. They develop tests for nonresponse and sample selection biases, although due to a lack of instrumental variables and contract endogeneity, they must speculate on the size of the bias. They find that contract use is associated with income that is 13.7% higher (for New York State respondents 21.7% higher) than income produced without a contract. They also find that contract use reduces nonpayment; however, even when a contract is used, 38.8% of respondents still had trouble getting paid: One-third were paid late, and 10% were either paid less than the agreed upon amount or were never paid.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00197939140670s310

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over one third of independent workers experienced difficulty getting paid even with contracts; they were paid late, underpaid, or even never paid.

    “Rodgers et al. (2014) found that over one third of independent workers experienced difficulty getting paid even with contracts; they were paid late, underpaid, or even never paid.”

    From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Rodgers et al. (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodgers, W. M., Horowitz, S., & Wuolo, G.
Venue
ILR Review
Published
2014-05
Volume
67
Issue
3_suppl
Pages
702-733
ISSN
  • 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-271X
OpenAlex
W1493001770
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial and Labor Relations Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
Keywords
contingent workers, freelancers, independent workers, written contracts, income, late payment, nonresponse bias, sample selection bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review