The Impact of Client Nonpayment on the Income of Contingent Workers: Evidence from the Freelancers Union Independent Worker Survey
Abstract
The authors use the Freelancers Union's annual Independent Worker Survey (IWS) from 2007 to 2011, the union's administrative membership file, and the American Community Survey to estimate the extent to which client nonpayment of independent workers is a problem and the ability of a written contract to reduce the odds of nonpayment. They develop tests for nonresponse and sample selection biases, although due to a lack of instrumental variables and contract endogeneity, they must speculate on the size of the bias. They find that contract use is associated with income that is 13.7% higher (for New York State respondents 21.7% higher) than income produced without a contract. They also find that contract use reduces nonpayment; however, even when a contract is used, 38.8% of respondents still had trouble getting paid: One-third were paid late, and 10% were either paid less than the agreed upon amount or were never paid.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Over one third of independent workers experienced difficulty getting paid even with contracts; they were paid late, underpaid, or even never paid.
“Rodgers et al. (2014) found that over one third of independent workers experienced difficulty getting paid even with contracts; they were paid late, underpaid, or even never paid.”
From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Rodgers et al. (2014)
Cites
Using Survey Participants to Estimate the Impact of Nonparticipation
Lin, I.-F., & Schaeffer, N. C. (1995) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269471 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research
Wu, D., & Huang, J. L. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2775 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rodgers, W. M., Horowitz, S., & Wuolo, G.
- ORCID
- Rodgers, William M.
- Venue
- ILR Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3_suppl
- Pages
- 702-733
- ISSN
- 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-271X
- OpenAlex
- W1493001770
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial and Labor Relations Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
- Keywords
- contingent workers, freelancers, independent workers, written contracts, income, late payment, nonresponse bias, sample selection bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review