The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Theory of Multilateral Collective Bargaining in City Governments
Abstract
Discusses the nature of the collective bargaining process in city governments in the United States. Concept of multilateral bargaining; Determinants of multilateral bargaining; Measurement of multilateral bargaining. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“cooperation generally fosters constructive outcomes while competition tends to yield destructive results”
From Analysis of Conflict Management Styles and Organisational Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Kochan (1974)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Analysis of Conflict Management Styles and Organisational Performance
(2025) · Journal of Management Changes in the Digital Era · doi:10.33168/jmcde.2025.0104 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kochan, T. A.
- Corresponding author
- Kochan, Thomas A.
- ORCID
- Kochan, Thomas A.
- Venue
- ILR Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1974-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-542
- ISSN
- 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-271X
- OpenAlex
- W2027552275
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 25.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial and Labor Relations Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Labor Movements and Unions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- municipal government, municipal labor relations, public sector unions, negotiation process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review