The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Who Blows the Whistle and Why?
Abstract
This study examines the effects of a number of perceptual variables on internal auditors' reporting of wrongdoing by employees and managers in their organizations. Survey responses of 653 Directors of Internal Auditing who observed what they perceived to be incidents of wrongdoing show that they were less likely to report these incidents when they did not feel compelled morally or by role prescription to do so, when they evaluated their job performance as below average, or when they were employed by highly bureaucratic organizations. Also, the auditors were more likely to report incidents to external agencies (as opposed to authorities within the organization) when they felt that the public or their co-workers were harmed by the wrongdoing, the wrongdoing involved theft by relatively low-level workers, there were few other observers, or the organization was highly regulated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Cited by
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0849-1 · Cited by 854
Sturman, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00028-x · Cited by 578
Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables
Sims, R. L., & Keenan, J. P. (1998) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1005763807868 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Schwenk, C. R.
- Venue
- ILR Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-130
- ISSN
- 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-271X
- OpenAlex
- W2138934348
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who Blows the Whistle and Why? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001979399104500108
- The paper
- Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Schwenk, C. R. (1991). Who Blows the Whistle and Why? ILR Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399104500108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.