A smart PLC-SCADA framework for monitoring petroleum products terminals in industry 4.0 via machine learning
Open accessAbstract
The paper introduces a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) / Human Machine Interface (HMI) system incorporated along with machine learning (ML) classifiers. Although some other studies have incorporated ML techniques to predict and control petroleum product terminals in terms of concentration, the proposed framework incorporates Add On Instruction (AOI) programming, PLC, and ML methods to automatically monitor petroleum products terminals. The framework adds an AOI in programming to achieve maximum usage of processor capabilities. Moreover, it uses AOI for programming in cooperation with the ladder diagram (LD). This leads to simplifying the LD graphical programming language, reducing the time of scanning, and making facilitate troubleshooting. The AOI is merged with ML to automate tank level detection and maintain good operational conditions and consequently protect these expensive essential assets. The introduced framework consists of three stages. The first stage is the PLC programming phase where the PLC is created using Add-On instructions. Next, HMI graphic displays are drawn and linked to the PLC tags in the following stage. During the third stage, the actual process readings are applied to the system based on ML algorithms to test its functionality. The proposed system results indicates a reduction in the LD number, highest program size, and maximum time of scanning. The results indicate that the AOI can help to trace the program more easily in fault situations. Besides, additional program instructions could reduce processor memory, system construction costs, and upgrade projects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The hybrid detection model outperformed earlier studies such as Rashad et al. (2022) that reported FPR near 0.04.
“The hybrid detection model recorded an average FPR of 0.009 with a detection accuracy of 99.1%, outperforming earlier studies such as Rashad et al. (2022), which reported FPR values near 0.04 in similar AI-based ICS detection frameworks.”
From ADAPTING PLC/SCADA SYSTEMS TO MITIGATE INDUSTRIAL IOT CYBERSECURITY RISKS IN GLOBAL MANUFACTURING (2024) · cites this paper as Rashad et al. (2022)
Cites
González, I., Calderón, A. J., Figueiredo, J., & Sousa, J. M. C. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8050510 · Cited by 103 · cited 1× · see citing works
“12,50,51 Programmable logic controller/HMI software tools Based on IEC61131 standards, 12 Rockwell Automation (RA) simulation tools are used rather than actual PLC programming.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ADAPTING PLC/SCADA SYSTEMS TO MITIGATE INDUSTRIAL IOT CYBERSECURITY RISKS IN GLOBAL MANUFACTURING
Phillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical Engineering, L. U., Tarek, J. H., Hasan, Z., & Master in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, C. O. E. (2024) · American Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies · doi:10.63125/0v4cms60 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rashad, O., Attallah, O., & Morsi, I.
- Affiliations
- Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport (EG)
- Corresponding author
- Attallah, Omneya
- Venue
- Measurement and Control
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 830-848
- ISSN
- 0020-2940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285093786
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Measurement and Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Algorithms and Applications
- Keywords
- programmable logic controller, SCADA, Industry 4.0, ladder diagrams, human-machine interaction, machine learning classifiers, process monitoring, PLC programming, scan time reduction, fault detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review