Cited by 23Industrial Automation and Control SystemsFault Detection and Control SystemsAdvanced Algorithms and Applications

A smart PLC-SCADA framework for monitoring petroleum products terminals in industry 4.0 via machine learning

Open access
Rashad, Ossama, Attallah, Omneya, Morsi, Iman·2022·Measurement and Control

Abstract

The paper introduces a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) / Human Machine Interface (HMI) system incorporated along with machine learning (ML) classifiers. Although some other studies have incorporated ML techniques to predict and control petroleum product terminals in terms of concentration, the proposed framework incorporates Add On Instruction (AOI) programming, PLC, and ML methods to automatically monitor petroleum products terminals. The framework adds an AOI in programming to achieve maximum usage of processor capabilities. Moreover, it uses AOI for programming in cooperation with the ladder diagram (LD). This leads to simplifying the LD graphical programming language, reducing the time of scanning, and making facilitate troubleshooting. The AOI is merged with ML to automate tank level detection and maintain good operational conditions and consequently protect these expensive essential assets. The introduced framework consists of three stages. The first stage is the PLC programming phase where the PLC is created using Add-On instructions. Next, HMI graphic displays are drawn and linked to the PLC tags in the following stage. During the third stage, the actual process readings are applied to the system based on ML algorithms to test its functionality. The proposed system results indicates a reduction in the LD number, highest program size, and maximum time of scanning. The results indicate that the AOI can help to trace the program more easily in fault situations. Besides, additional program instructions could reduce processor memory, system construction costs, and upgrade projects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00202940221103305

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hybrid detection model outperformed earlier studies such as Rashad et al. (2022) that reported FPR near 0.04.

    “The hybrid detection model recorded an average FPR of 0.009 with a detection accuracy of 99.1%, outperforming earlier studies such as Rashad et al. (2022), which reported FPR values near 0.04 in similar AI-based ICS detection frameworks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rashad, O., Attallah, O., & Morsi, I.
Affiliations
Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport (EG)
Corresponding author
Attallah, Omneya
Venue
Measurement and Control
Published
2022-07
Volume
55
Issue
7-8
Pages
830-848
ISSN
0020-2940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285093786
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Measurement and Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
programmable logic controller, SCADA, Industry 4.0, ladder diagrams, human-machine interaction, machine learning classifiers, process monitoring, PLC programming, scan time reduction, fault detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review