Cited by 12Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society in Latin AmericaMental Health Treatment and Access

Religious Affiliation and Psychiatric Morbidity in Brazil: Higher Rates Among Evangelicals and Spiritists

Dalgalarrondo, Paulo, Marín-León, Leticia, Botega, Neury José, De Azevedo Barros, Marilisa Berti, Bosco de Oliveira, Helenice·2008·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Aims: To verify the association between the prevalence of mental symptoms and excessive alcohol intake with religious affiliation, church attendance and personal religiosity. Methods: A household survey of 515 adults randomly sampled included the WHO SUPRE-MISS questionnaire, SRQ-20 and AUDIT. Weighted prevalences were estimated and logistic analyses were performed. Results: Minor psychiatric morbidity was greater among Spiritists and Protestants/ Evangelicals than in Catholics and in the `no-religion' group. The latter had a greater frequency of abusive alcohol drinking pattern and Protestants/Evangelicals showed lower drinking patterns. Conclusions: Although belonging to Protestant/Evangelical churches in Brazil may inhibit alcohol involvement it seems to be associated to a higher frequency of depressive symptoms. Processes of seeking relief in new religious affiliations among sub-groups with previous minor psychiatric symptoms may probably occur in the Brazilian society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764008091439

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of 120 highest-rigor studies on R/S and well-being, 98 (82%) reported positive relationships and one reported a negative relationship at trend level.

    “Of the 120 studies with the highest methodological rigor (7 or higher in quality on the 0–10 scale), 98 (82%) reported positive relationships (including two at a trend level) [67–77] and one study reported a negative relationship (but only at a trend level) [78].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalgalarrondo, P., Marín-León, L., Botega, N. J., De Azevedo Barros, M. B., & Bosco de Oliveira, H.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, School of Medical Sciences, Campinas, SP, Brazil
Corresponding author
Dalgalarrondo, Paulo
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2008-11
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
562-574
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W2060318771
Cited by
12
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
religious affiliation, psychiatric morbidity, evangelical Christians, spiritism, Protestants, Catholics, church attendance, individual religiosity, depressive symptoms, alcohol abuse, excessive alcohol intake, new religious movements, Brazil
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Brazil, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Spiritualism, Urban Population, Protestantism, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review