Cited by 20Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of a psychiatric label on medical residents’ attitudes

Neauport, Audrey, Rodgers, Rachel F., Simon, Naomi M., Birmes, Philippe J., Schmitt, Laurent, Bui, Eric·2012·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Few data are available on the effects of a psychiatric label on medical residents' attitudes towards an individual. Aims To investigate the effect of a psychiatric label on the attitudes of medical residents towards an individual. Methods Medical residents were randomly assigned to one of two vignettes describing the same apparently healthy person, differing only in the presence of a psychiatric label for one of them. Participants (N = 322) reported their attitudes towards the described individual and their willingness to treat this person. Results Residents allocated to the psychiatric-diagnostic label group reported being less at ease with becoming the individual's nextdoor neighbour, working in the same place, sharing a house, having him look after their children, having a member of their family date him, having their finances run by the individual, less willing to become friends with the described individual and more uneasy having to examine him the next time he visits the emergency room. Conclusion Implementing effective programmes to combat stigma in the curriculum of medical residents appears to be needed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764011408652

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neauport 2012 found those assigned the vignette that included the psychiatric illness label said that they were less likely to want to treat the individual and be involved with her/him in various ways.

    “Those assigned the vignette that included the psychiatric illness label said that they were less likely to want to treat the individual and be involved with her/him in various ways.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Neauport, A., Rodgers, R. F., Simon, N. M., Birmes, P. J., Schmitt, L., & Bui, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Laboratoire du Stress Traumatique, CHU de Toulouse & Université de Toulouse, France
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2011-06-28
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
485-487
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W2049333472
Cited by
20
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
mental health stigma, psychiatric diagnosis, medical residents, attitudes toward people with mental illness, diagnostic labels, willingness to treat, stigma reduction, medical education
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Professional-Patient Relations, Stereotyping, Refusal to Treat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review