Cited by 23Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringPublic Policy and Administration ResearchCommunity Development and Social Impact

What type of nonprofit organization is preferred in government contracting in China?

Dong, Qiang, Lu, Jiahuan·2021·International Review of Administrative Sciences

Abstract

Government contracting with nonprofit organizations in service delivery has become a widespread practice in the public administration landscape. This research explores what kinds of nonprofits are more likely to receive government funding for service delivery. Viewing nonprofits’ pursuit of government funding as an interorganizational effort, we examine the contextual and organizational factors that influence nonprofits’ receipt of government funding. Using the data collected from a nationwide survey of Chinese nonprofits, we find a close contractual relationship between government and nonprofits. Further analysis suggests that policy advocacy, board co-optation, external competition, and organizational formalization have positive impacts on leveraging government funding, while interorganizational collaboration and organizational professionalization do not appear to play a significant role. To our knowledge, this study represents the first nationwide survey research on government–nonprofit contracting in China. The findings expand the literature by adding new empirical evidence from an authoritarian context. Points for practitioners This study examines the contextual and organizational factors affecting Chinese nonprofit organizations’ receipt of purchase-of-service contracts from government. The results indicate that nonprofit organizations engaging in more policy advocacy activities, having more people with government working experience on governing boards, facing stronger…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020852319862347

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, Q., & Lu, J.
Affiliations
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Lu, Jiahuan
Venue
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Published
2019-09-14
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
328-346
ISSN
  • 0020-8523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7226
OpenAlex
W2972811933
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Review of Administrative Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hong Kong Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
Keywords
nonprofit organizations, public procurement, government funding, service delivery, policy advocacy, organizational formalization, inter-organizational collaboration, authoritarian contexts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review