Cited by 11Disability Rights and RepresentationLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Community responses to LGBT+ adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities during the COVID-19 confinement in Madrid

Open access
Platero, R Lucas, López-Sáez, Miguel Ángel·2023·International Social Work

Abstract

A group of 50 people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) as well as diverse sexualities and gender identities in Madrid participated in a feminist community-based project, which supported them through the first wave of the pandemic. Facilitated by professionals, the project offered online meetings twice a month, helping them to articulate their needs and promote their agency over their choices and experiences. Based on their demands, participants chose the topics they wanted to discuss, proposed activities, and were the center of the program, while facilitators set up and maintained the online space, helping with participation and access to information and resources. Through this transformative experience, the members of the group developed friendship networks and started their activism, making public appearances in video campaigns and mainstream newspapers to make their needs visible to peers, families, social workers, policy makers, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). This research is part of a larger project that tackles the psychosocial factors that affected Spanish people with sexual and gender diversity during the first wave of the pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00208728211044741

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the challenges that COVID-19 poses to the mental and sexual health of sexual minority young adults, creating a confidential, safe, and supportive online space that fosters development of coping skills such as mindfulness could be an effective and accessible approach to reach and engage vulnerable sexual minority men and enhance population health.

    “With the challenges that COVID-19 poses to the mental and sexual health of sexual minority young adults (e.g., increased isolation, lack of access to community support), creating a confidential, safe, and supportive online space that fosters development of coping skills such as mindfulness could be an effective and accessible approach to reach and engage vulnerable sexual minority men and enhance”

    From Mindfulness for Reducing Minority Stress and Promoting Health Among Sexual Minority Men: Uncovering Intervention Principles and Techniques (2022) · cites this paper as Platero & López-Sáez, 2021

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  2. Izutsu T (2019) Disability-Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction and Humanitarian Action: An Urgent Global Imperative (United Nations World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction and the Progress Thereafter). New York: United Nations.
  3. León OG and Montero I (2015) Métodos de investigación en psicología y educación. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Moscoso M and Platero RL (2019) Cripwashing y las políticas acerca del derecho a decidir sobre el propio cuerpo. In: López S and Platero L (eds) Cuerpos marcados. Vidas que cuentan y políticas públicas. Barcelona: Bellaterra, pp. 133-158.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Platero, R. L., & López-Sáez, M. Á.
Affiliations
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain
Venue
International Social Work
Published
2021-10-04
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
107-116
ISSN
  • 0020-8728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7234
OpenAlex
W3207457042
Cited by
11
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Emma Goldman Award, Flax Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
intellectual and developmental disabilities, LGBT adults, COVID-19 pandemic, community-based support, feminist perspectives, participant agency, friendship networks, activism, sexual and gender diversity, psychosocial factors, Madrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review