Cited by 690Organizational Downsizing and RestructuringPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Relationships, Layoffs, and Organizational Resilience: Airline Industry Responses to September 11

Gittell, Jody Hoffer, Cameron, Kim, Lim, Sandy, Rivas, Victor·2006·The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Abstract

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, affected the U.S. airline industry more than almost any other industry. Certain airlines emerged successful and demonstrated remarkable resilience while others languished. This investigation identifies reasons why some airline companies recovered successfully after the attacks while others struggled. Evidence is provided that layoffs after the crisis, although intended to foster recovery, instead inhibited recovery throughout the 4 years after the crisis. But, layoffs after the crisis were strongly correlated with lack of financial reserves and lack of a viable business model prior to the crisis. Digging deeper, the authors find that having a viable business model itself depended on the development and preservation of relational reserves over time. Our model shows that the maintenance of adequate financial reserves enables the preservation of relational reserves and vice versa, contributing to organizational resilience in times of crisis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0021886306286466

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social capital helps to achieve coordinated and successful action in times of crisis.

    “Social capital helps to achieve coordinated and successful action in times of crisis (Leana and van Buren 1999;Faraj and Sproull 2000;Gittell et al. 2006;McGuinness and Johnson 2014).”

    From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Gittell et al. 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gittell, J. H., Cameron, K., Lim, S., & Rivas, V.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
  • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (US)
Venue
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Published
2006-09
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
300-329
ISSN
  • 0021-8863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6879
OpenAlex
W2147403921
Cited by
690
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
14.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
organizational resilience, airline industry, September 11 attacks, layoffs, financial reserves, business model viability, crisis recovery, interorganizational relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review