The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Narrative Studies, Personal Stories, and Identity Transformation in the Mutual Help Context
Abstract
A common way for researchers to think about mutual help organizations is as alternative treatments for people with problems in living. This approach, illustrated here in the context of a series of empirical studies conducted by the author, views people as service seekers. Although much can be gained from research in which there is collaboration between professionals and the self-help community, there remains a need for work that uses theories and methods consistent with the experiences of the members and the ethos of the organizations. A different way to understand mutual help organizations is to view them as normative narrative communities where identity transformation takes place. This approach forces us to listen to the personal stories that people tell about their lives. It has several advantages, including the reduction of professional centrism and the explicit linking of individual lives to community processes. A narrative studies framework also has the advantage of tying mutual help to a great deal of cross-disciplinary research, including cognitive psychology, anthropology, sociology, and literary analysis. General features of models for understanding the role of narratives, autobiographical memory, and personal change through identity transformation are described in the context of mutual help organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806
Cited by
Peer Support/Peer Provided Services Underlying Processes, Benefits, and Critical Ingredients.
Solomon, P. (2004) · Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.2975/27.2004.392.401 · Cited by 1,060
Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach
Maton, K. I., & Salem, D. A. (1995) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02506985 · Cited by 414
On the Discursive Construction of Success/Failure in Narratives of Post-Merger Integration
Vaara, E. (2002) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840602232003 · Cited by 384
Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Griffin, K., & Lord, J. (1998) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1022298129812 · Cited by 277
Narrative Explanation: An Alternative to Variable-Centered Explanation?
Abell, P. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100113 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Rappaport, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-256
- ISSN
- 0021-8863 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6879
- OpenAlex
- W2007292841
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Narrative Studies, Personal Stories, and Identity Transformation in the Mutual Help Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0021886393292007
- The paper
- Rappaport, J. (1993). Narrative Studies, Personal Stories, and Identity Transformation in the Mutual Help Context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886393292007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.