The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing Organizational Legitimacy: Communication Strategies for Organizations in Crisis
Abstract
Crisis situations can cause internal and external stakeholders to question the legit imacy of organizations. When faced with a crisis, organizations are compelled to communicate strategically with stakeholders to manage legitimacy. This study syn thesizes literature on organizational legitimacy, crisis management, and niche-width theory to provide an investigation of the effects of crisis-response strategies on per ceptions of organizational legitimacy. Using a quasi-experimental, 2 X 2 X 4 design, the study tests the hypotheses that (a) organizations that produce consis tent crisis responses across stakeholders will enhance their legitimacy, while organ izations that produce inconsistent crisis responses will reduce theirs; (b) generalist organizations are perceived as being more legitimate than specialist organizations; and (c) when combined, niche-width and crisis-response consistency will produce differing effects on organizational legitimacy. Conclusions drawn from the investi gation support these hypotheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.192960 · Cited by 1,534
Cited by
Coombs, W. T. (2004) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/0021943604265607 · Cited by 555
A Changing of the Guard: Executive and Director Turnover Following Corporate Financial Restatements
Arthaud-Day, M. L., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478165 · Cited by 554
A Burden of Responsibility: The Role of Social Approval at the Onset of a Crisis
Bundy, J., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0027 · Cited by 461
Soewarno, N., Tjahjadi, B., & Fithrianti, F. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2018-0563 · Cited by 346
Green organizational identity and green innovation
Chang, C., & Chen, Y. (2013) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-09-2011-0314 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Massey, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Communication
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-182
- ISSN
- 0021-9436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103021500
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing Organizational Legitimacy: Communication Strategies for Organizations in Crisis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002194360103800202
- The paper
- Massey, J. E. (2001). Managing Organizational Legitimacy: Communication Strategies for Organizations in Crisis. Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360103800202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.