The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green organizational identity and green innovation
Abstract
Purpose: The authors aim to apply an “interpretive context – organizational action – outcome” framework to explore the positive effect of green organizational identity on green innovation performance. Besides, they would like to verify that both environmental commitment and environmental organizational legitimacy mediate between green organizational identity and green innovation performance. Design/methodology/approach: The authors utilize a hybrid research method that includes both questionnaire data and public data to test the hypotheses to satisfy the triangulation in methodology. In addition, structural equation modeling (SEM) is used to perform the empirical research. Findings: The results show that green organizational identity would positively affect green innovation performance. Moreover, green organizational identity could positively influence green innovation performance indirectly via environmental commitment and environmental organizational legitimacy. Firms should increase their green organizational identity, environmental commitment, and environmental organizational legitimacy to enhance their green innovation performance. Furthermore, the authors find out that green organizational identity, environmental commitment, environmental organizational legitimacy, and green innovation performance of small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) are lower than those of large enterprises in Taiwan. Originality/value: The authors develop a research framework to explore the positive effect of green organizational identity on green innovation and explore the mediation effects of environmental commitment and environmental organizational legitimacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,003
Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975) · The Pacific Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/1388226 · Cited by 3,876
KEEPING AN EYE ON THE MIRROR: IMAGE AND IDENTITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION.
Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256405 · Cited by 2,931
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5 · Cited by 2,684
Self-citationOrganizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1580441 · Cited by 2,422
Sharma, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556361 · Cited by 1,867
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211216250 · Cited by 1,370
Self-citationHenriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256876 · Cited by 1,327
Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. (2002) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022102033005005 · Cited by 1,032
Cited by
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211216250 · Cited by 1,370
Self-citationFerreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004 · Cited by 848
The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities
Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052 · Cited by 665
Green Human Resource Management and Employee Green Behavior: An Empirical Analysis
Chaudhary, R. (2020) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1827 · Cited by 665
Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review
Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, Á., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2015) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2015.1011060 · Cited by 598
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, C., & Chen, Y.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-05-24
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1056-1070
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043061693
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green organizational identity and green innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/md-09-2011-0314
- The paper
- Chang, C., & Chen, Y. (2013). Green organizational identity and green innovation. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2011-0314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.