The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Study of the Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Cellulose Nanowhisker Composites Prepared by Solution Casting and Melt Processing
Abstract
In this study cellulose nanowhiskers (CNW) were prepared by sulfuric acid hyrolysis from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). The biopolymer composites of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV)/CNW, was fabricated by solution casting using N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as the solvent. Homogeneous dispersion of the whiskers was achieved and the composites exhibited improved tensile strength and modulus and increased glass transition temperature. The melt processing (extrusion and injection molding) of PHBV/CNW composites was also attempted. Despite using polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a compatibilizer, CNW agglomerates formed during freeze-drying could not be broken and well dispersed by the extrusion process due to the large surface area and the polar nature of CNW. As a result, the melt processed PHBV/CNW composites exhibited decreased strength and constant glass transition temperature, a typical trend of microparticle filled polymer systems. MCC was also treated by high-speed mechanical homogenizer to reduce its particle size down to nanoscale range. The homogenized MCC (HMCC) was blended with PHBV by melt processing with the same conditions. The obtained composites were found to have similar properties as the melt-processed PHBV/CNW composites due to poor HMCC dispersion. To the best of our knowledge, PHBV/ CNW system has not been studied so far. The treatment of MCC with high-speed homogenizer has also not been reported. This study augments the research on CNW nanocomposites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis
Bondeson, D., Mathew, A., & Oksman, K. (2006) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-006-9061-4 · Cited by 1,372
Biopolymers: overview of several properties and consequences on their applications
Van de Velde, K., & Kiekens, P. (2002) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/s0142-9418(01)00107-6 · Cited by 887
Structure and thermal properties of poly(lactic acid)/cellulose whiskers nanocomposite materials
Petersson, L., Kvien, I., & Oksman, K. (2007) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.12.012 · Cited by 576
Cited by
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites
Lee, K.-Y., Aitomäki, Y., Berglund, L. A., Oksman, K., & Bismarck, A. (2014) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.032 · Cited by 819
Díez-Pascual, A. M., & Díez-Vicente, A. L. (2014) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am502261e · Cited by 295
Pracella, M., Haque, M. M.-U., & Puglia, D. (2014) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.071 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, L., Morelius, E., Zhang, J., Wolcott, M., & Holbery, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Composite Materials
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-10-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2629-2645
- ISSN
- 0021-9983 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-793X
- OpenAlex
- W2103681735
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study of the Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Cellulose Nanowhisker Composites Prepared by Solution Casting and Melt Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0021998308096327
- The paper
- Jiang, L., Morelius, E., Zhang, J., Wolcott, M., & Holbery, J. (2008). Study of the Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/Cellulose Nanowhisker Composites Prepared by Solution Casting and Melt Processing. Journal of Composite Materials. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998308096327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.