The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizing Violence
Open accessAbstract
In stateless societies, coercion is privately provided; violence is employed to engage in, and to defend against, predation. At best, violence results in mere redistribution; being destructive, it more often results in a loss of social welfare. When organized, however, violence can be socially productive; it can be employed to defend property rights, thereby strengthening the incentives to engage in productive activity. To explore how violence can be rendered a source of welfare, the authors develop a model of a stateless society in which people's rights to the product of their labor are secure only if they possess coercive capabilities. Using case materials and formal logic, the authors then compare this outcome with that obtained when private agents reward specialists in violence for defending property rights. In doing so, we plumb the role of the state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408
Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth
Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (1995) · doi:10.3386/w5398 · Cited by 4,461
The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information
Fudenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1986) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911307 · Cited by 2,395
Cited by
Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia
Dube, O., & Vargas, J. F. (2013) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdt009 · Cited by 1,187
Handling and Manhandling Civilians in Civil War
HUMPHREYS, M., & WEINSTEIN, J. M. (2006) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055406062289 · Cited by 563
The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security
Avant, D. D. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490866 · Cited by 507
Economic Shocks and Conflict: Evidence from Commodity Prices
Bazzi, S., & Blattman, C. (2014) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.6.4.1 · Cited by 437
Family Structure, Institutions, and Growth: The Origins and Implications of Western Corporations
Greif, A. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282806777212602 · Cited by 272
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BATES, R., GREIF, A., & SINGH, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 599-628
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W4232331623
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizing Violence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002200202236166
- The paper
- BATES, R., GREIF, A., & SINGH, S. (2002). Organizing Violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200202236166
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.