The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Reasoning in IJO Children and Adolescents in Nigerian Communities
Abstract
The study examined moral judgments and concepts of social convention in Ijo communities located in the Niger Delta areas of Southern Nigeria. The main data analyses were based on responses from 46 subjects divided into three age groups: 8-11 years, 12-14 years, and 15-18 years (preliminary data were also obtained in a small village). Assessments were made of judgments about examples of a moral transgression and a breach of social convention. The examples used were based on pretesting for issues relevant to the community. With regard to each type of issue, subjects were asked to evaluate transgressions, provide explanations for their evaluations, and the extent to which punishment should be administered to the transgressors. Subjects were also posed with questions pertaining to the origins and alterability of rules, and authority jurisdiction over the rules. The findings showed differences in subjects' conceptual orientations to moral and conventional issues. Age differences were also found, mainly between the children and adolescents, in the patterns of responses to the various dimensions assessed. The findings indicate that two social conceptual orientations coexist in the Nigerian communities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These differences emerge early in life and appear to hold across societies [55], [56], [57].”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
Handbook of socialization theory and research
Grusec, J. E., & Hastings, P. D. (2007) · Cited by 5,003
The Moral Judgment Of The Child
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009681 · Cited by 4,409
The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention
Eggleston, S. J., & Turiel, E. (1985) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121515 · Cited by 2,645
Self-citationNonparametric and Distribution-Free Methods for the Social Sciences.
Bassler, J. F., Marascuilo, L. A., & McSweeney, M. (1978) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286625 · Cited by 981
Preschool Children's Conceptions of Moral and Social Rules
Smetana, J. G. (1981) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129527 · Cited by 696
Social Interactions and the Development of Social Concepts in Preschool Children
Nucci, L. P., & Turiel, E. (1978) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1128704 · Cited by 605
Self-citationSocial cognition and social development : a sociocultural perspective
Higgins, E. T., Ruble, D. N., & Hartup, W. W. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 582
Handbook of socialization : theory and research
Grusec, J., & Hastings, P. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-0345 · Cited by 569
Conceptions of Personal Issues: A Domain Distinct from Moral or Societal Concepts
Nucci, L. P. (1981) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129220 · Cited by 500
Davidson, P. M., Turiel, E., & Black, A. (1983) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1983.tb00543.x · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–152 of 152
The Development of Moral and Social Judgments
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.006 · Cited by 1
Self-citationConcepções sobre Regras Morais e Convencionais em Crianças de Pré-Escola e do Primeiro Grau
Martins, R. A. (2012) · Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa · Cited by 1
GRAMÁTICA EMOCIONAL: BASES COGNITIVAS Y SOCIALES DEL JUICIO MORAL
Bohórquez, T., & Oliverio, J. (2011) · Cited by 1
Nichols, S. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195169344.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Zijlstra, L. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003301424-6 · Cited by 1
A Fragment of the Genealogy of Norms
Nichols, S. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195169344.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.001
Self-citationPerspectives on Cultural Practices: More Than One
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.011
Self-citationTuriel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.013
Self-citationSocial Judgments and Social Contexts
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.005
Self-citationSocial Harmony and Social Conflict
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.008
Self-citationTuriel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.003
Self-citation3 Genes, Environments, and Concepts of Biological Inheritance
Mameli, M. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0003
Preschool Children’s Conceptions of Moral, Social-Conventionaland Personal Situations
부성숙 (2007) · Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education · doi:10.18023/kjece.2007.27.4.002
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.002
Self-citationTuriel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.012
Self-citationJustice, Heterogeneity, and Cultural Practices
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.009
Self-citationNichols, S. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195169344.003.0002
Is It Irrational to Be Amoral?
Nichols, S. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195169344.003.0003
Sentiment, Reason, and Motivation
Nichols, S. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195169344.003.0005
Colebrook, R. (2018) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
The Components of Moral-Developmental Controversy: Issues and Methods.
Kahn, P. H. (1989)
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.004
Self-citation(2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444390896.refs
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0004
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0007
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0010
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0012
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0011
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0005
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0006
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0009
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0008
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.003.0003
Nichols, S. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195169344.003.0007
Goswami, U. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470996652.refs
(2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.002.0007
(2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.002.0005
(2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.002.0004
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.002.0003
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.002.0004
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.002.0007
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.002.0005
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197600122.002.0008
The Development of Conceptions of the Right to Literacy in Traditional Rural Africa.
Day, K. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.014
Self-citationSocial Hierarchy, Subordination, and Human Capabilities
Turiel, E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613500.010
Self-citationFonctionnement socio-cognitif : proposition d'une épreuve neuropsychologique et avancées théoriques
Msika, E.-F. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/27068e11z716ez4c54z9ee8z0a0d412374a7
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollos, M., Leis, P. E., & Turiel, E.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 352-374
- ISSN
- 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5422
- OpenAlex
- W2129398602
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- moral judgment, social conventions, moral transgression, age differences, children and adolescents, punishment, Niger Delta
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review