The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation: A Quantitative Test
Abstract
Fears of rogue states, withdrawal of cold war-era security guarantees, a falling technological threshold, and availability to terrorist organizations ensure that nuclear weapons proliferation remains a central security issue and that developing an adequate theory of proliferation ranks high on the agenda. A data set on nuclear proliferation is constructed that identifies three different stages on the path to the weaponization of nuclear weapons technology. Hazard models and multinomial logit are used to test theories of nuclear proliferation. Results suggest that nuclear weapons proliferation is strongly associated with the level of economic development, the external threat environment, lack of great-power security guarantees, and a low level of integration in the world economy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research
Collier, D., & Mahoney, J. (1996) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1996.0023 · Cited by 658 · cited 2×
“Ignoring nonproliferators runs the risk of underestimating the strength of causal effects or, more rarely, erroneously accepting a relationship that does not hold up in a wider sample (Collier and Mahoney, 1996; Dion 1998; Geddes 1990; King, Keohane, and Verba 1994). For example, as Sagan (2000) points out, ana-”
BackgroundEvidence and Inference in the Comparative Case Study
Dion, D. (1998) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422284 · Cited by 261
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.4135/9781412984195 · DOI · Paper page
- Barletta, M., 1999, National Security Studies Quarterly, 5, 19
- 10.2307/2991855 · DOI
- 10.1080/03050620008434965 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09636419309347521 · doi:10.1080/09636419309347521
- 10.2307/2960496 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002200277501900201 · doi:10.1177/002200277501900201
- Bueno de Mesquita, B., 1981, The war trap
- 10.1080/09636419309347522 · doi:10.1080/09636419309347522
- Correlates of War Project, 2003, State system membership list, v2002.1
- 10.1080/09636419309347520 · DOI
- Diehl, P. F., 1998, The dynamics of enduring rivalries
- Elworthy, S., 1986, How nuclear weapons decisions are made
- 10.1080/09636419309347519 · DOI
- 10.1093/pan/2.1.131 · doi:10.1093/pan/2.1.131
- Ghosn, F., 2003, Codebook for the militarized interstate dispute data, version 3.0
- Gibler, D. M., 2002, Coding manual for v3.0 of the Correlates of War formal interstate alliance data set, 1816-2000
- 10.1177/0022002702046005006 · doi:10.1177/0022002702046005006 · Paper page
- 10.1080/09636419309347525 · DOI
- Heston, A., 2002, Penn world table version 6.1
- 10.1177/0022343395032004007 · DOI · Paper page
- Kapur, A., 2001, Pokhran and beyond: India’s nuclear behaviour
- Kegley, C. W., Jr., 1980, Korea and World Affairs, 4, 5
- 10.1080/09636419309347524 · DOI
- Lieberson, S., 1992, What is a case?
- 10.1093/sf/72.4.1225 · DOI
- Maddison, A., 2002, The world economy: A millennial perspective
- 10.2307/2539213 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2538981 · DOI · Paper page
- Meyer, S. M., 1984, The dynamics of nuclear proliferation
- 10.1080/10736709608436652 · DOI
- Paul, T. V., 2000, Power versus prudence: Why nations forgo nuclear weapons
- Perkovich, G., 1999, India’s nuclear bomb: The impact on global proliferation
- Potter, W. C., 1982, Nuclear power and nonproliferation: An interdisciplinary perspective
- Quester, G. H., 1973, The politics of nuclear proliferation
- Quester, G. H., 1977, Offense and defense in the international system
- Sagan, S. D., 2000, The coming crisis: Nuclear proliferation, U.S. interests, and world order, 17
- Schroeer, D., 1984, Science, technology, and the nuclear arms race
- 10.1111/0020-8833.00113 · DOI · Paper page
- Singer, J. D., 1972, Peace, war, and numbers
- Singer, J. D., 1982, Resort to arms
- Snyder, J. L., 2000, From voting to violence: Democratization and nationalist conflict
- 10.2307/2539198 · DOI
- Solingen, E., 1998, Regional orders at century’s dawn: Global and domestic influences on grand strategy
- 10.1080/09636419509347592 · doi:10.1080/09636419509347592
- 10.1080/10736709708436690 · doi:10.1080/10736709708436690
- Waltz, K., 1979, Theory of international politics
Cited by
The International studies encyclopedia
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6629 · Cited by 499
Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy
Sechser, T. S., & Fuhrmann, M. (2016) · doi:10.1017/9781316227305 · Cited by 155
Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics?
Horowitz, M. C. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032725 · Cited by 73
What Does It Take to Deter? Regional Power Nuclear Postures and International Conflict
Narang, V. (2013) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002712448909 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, S., & Way, C. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 859-885
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W2135849699
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation: A Quantitative Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022002704269655
- The paper
- Singh, S., & Way, C. R. (2004). The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation: A Quantitative Test. Journal of Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704269655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
