The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eugene: A conceptual manual
Abstract
The study of international relations using quantitative analysis relies, in part, on the availability of comprehensive and easily manipulable data sets. To execute large‐n statistical tests of hypotheses, data must be available on the variables of interest, and those data must be manipulated into a suitable format to allow the inclusion of appropriate control variables as well as variables of central theoretical interest This paper introduces software designed to eliminate many of the difficulties commonly involved in constructing large international relations data sets, and with the unavailability of data on expected utility theories of war. In order to solve these two problems, we developed EUGene (the Expected Utility Generation and Data Management Program). EUGene is a stand‐alone Microsoft Windows based program for the construction of annual data sets for use in quantitative studies of international relations. It generates data for variables necessary to incorporate key variables from implementations of the so‐called “expected utility theory of war” into broader analyses of international conflict EUGene is also designed to make building international relations data sets simple. It accomplishes this by automating a variety of tasks necessary to integrate several data building blocks commonly used in tests of international relations theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“Draining the Sea”: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare
Valentino, B., Huth, P., & Balch-Lindsay, D. (2004) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818304582061 · Cited by 676
Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows
Li, Q., & Vashchilko, T. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.91 · Cited by 280
Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick? Veterans in the Political Elite and the American Use of Force
Gelpi, C., & Feaver, P. D. (2002) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540200045x · Cited by 179
The Effect of Sanctions on U.S. Foreign Direct Investment
Biglaiser, G., & Lektzian, D. (2011) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818311000117 · Cited by 128
Sanctions, Signals, and Militarized Conflict
Lektzian, D. J., & Sprecher, C. M. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00259.x · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, D. S., & Stam, A. C.
- Venue
- International Interactions
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-204
- ISSN
- 0305-0629 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7444
- OpenAlex
- W3124594404
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 88.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eugene: A conceptual manual. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03050620008434965
- The paper
- Bennett, D. S., & Stam, A. C. (2000). Eugene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620008434965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.