Revisiting economic shocks and coups
Abstract
This article revisits the oft-cited relationship between economic shocks and coups. According to conventional wisdom, economic recessions trigger coups. However, existing empirical studies have not consistently produced supporting evidence for that relationship. This article claims that this is partly because existing studies have not differentiated transitory from permanent shocks to the economy. Two different economic shocks could have different effects on coups. Moreover, existing studies have not sufficiently addressed measurement error in gross domestic product (GDP) data. To overcome these problems, I use exogenous rainfall and temperature variation to instrument for economic growth. Instrumental estimates demonstrate, consistently across four different GDP per capita growth measures, that a decrease in GDP per capita growth rates, induced by short-run weather shocks, significantly increases the probability of a coup attempt. Conversely, noninstrumental variable estimates vary according to different GDP measures, and are close to zero, consistent with previous findings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Undermined state capacity to mediate conflicts and guarantee public income support, food aid, employment, and human security gives way to increasing conflict at communal and individual levels, including criminal and gender-based violence.
“Besides the rebel groups incentivized by higher recruitment potential during economic downturns, the undermined capacity of the state to mediate conflicts and guarantee public income support, food aid, employment, and human security would also give way to increasing conflict at the communal and individual levels, including criminal and gender-based violence (Kim 2016, van Daalen et al 2022).”
From The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways (2024) · cites this paper as Kim 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Kim, N. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Nam Kyu
- ORCID
- Kim, Nam Kyu
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02-18
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-31
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W1966001177
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 27.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Keywords
- coups d'état, economic shocks, economic recession, GDP per capita growth, rainfall shocks, temperature variation, weather shocks, coup attempt, instrumental variables
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review