CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Political Conflict and GovernanceMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationMigration and Labor Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Spatial Model of Internal Displacement and Forced Migration

Echevarria-Coco, Jon, Gardeazabal, Javier·2021·Journal of Conflict Resolution
DOI 10.1177/0022002720958470
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article develops a spatial model of internal and external forced migration. We propose a model reminiscent of Hotelling’s spatial model in economics and Schelling’s model of segregation. Conflict is modeled as a shock that hits a country at certain location and generates displacement of people located near the shock’s location. Some displaced people cross a border, thus becoming refugees, while others remain as Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs). The model delivers predictions about how the fractions of a country’s population that become refugees and IDPs ought to be related with the intensity of the shock, country size, terrain ruggedness and the degree of geographical proximity of the country with respect to the rest of the world. The predictions of the model are then tested against real data using a panel of 161 countries covering the period 1995-2016. The empirical evidence is mostly in line with the predictions of the model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022002720958470

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Akgündüz Y. E., 2018, GLO Discussion Paper Series 186
  2. Ball P., 2002, Technical report
  3. 10.1177/001979399004300205 · DOI
  4. Cely S. P., 2020, CREA Discussion Paper Series 20-05
  5. Ferris E., 2010, Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2011
  6. Kälin W., 2008, Stud. Transnat’l Legal Pol’y, 38, 1
  7. McEniry M., 2019, SSM—Population Health, 100369, 7
  8. Munive J., 2019, Journal of Refugee Studies, 1
  9. Riley S., 1999, Internation Journal of Science, 5, 23
  10. Rozo S. V., 2020, Paper presented at the ASSA 2020 Meeting in San Diego

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Echevarria-Coco, J., & Gardeazabal, J.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • The University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2020-09-25
Volume
65
Issue
2-3
Pages
591-618
ISSN
  • 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8766
DOI
10.1177/0022002720958470
OpenAlex
W3088024484
Cited by
19
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (Mineco-FEDER ECO2015-64467-R)
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (IT783-13)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
Keywords
internal displacement, forced migration, refugees, internally displaced persons, spatial modeling, border crossing, terrain ruggedness, country size, geographic proximity, Schelling segregation model, Hotelling model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review