The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deterrence or Escalation?: The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent
Abstract
Aggregate data studies of domestic political conflict have used an Action-Reaction (AR) model that has produced contradictory findings about the repression/dissent nexus: Repression by regimes may either increase or decrease dissent by opposition groups. To clarify these findings I propose an alternative Rational Actor (RA) model from which are derived three propositions. (1) An increase in a government's repression of nonviolence will reduce the nonviolent activities of an opposition group but increase its violent activities. (2) The balance of effects, that is, whether an increase in the regime's repression increases or decreases the opposition group's total dissident activities, depends upon the government's accommodative policy to the group. (3) Consistent government accommodative and repressive policies reduce dissent; inconsistent policies increase dissent. The RA model thus accounts for the contradictory findings produced by the AR-based aggregate data studies of repression and dissent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
Kalyvas, S. N. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462 · Cited by 3,314
Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992
Hegre, H. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000119 · Cited by 1,619
HARFF, B. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000522 · Cited by 849
“Draining the Sea”: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare
Valentino, B., Huth, P., & Balch-Lindsay, D. (2004) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818304582061 · Cited by 676
It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome
Cunningham, D. E., Skrede Gleditsch, K., & Salehyan, I. (2009) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002709336458 · Cited by 671
Metadata
- Authors
- Lichbach, M. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 266-297
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W2157391464
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deterrence or Escalation?: The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022002787031002003
- The paper
- Lichbach, M. I. (1987). Deterrence or Escalation?: The Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002787031002003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.