Cited by 676Political Conflict and GovernanceMilitary History and StrategyTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

“Draining the Sea”: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare

Valentino, Benjamin, Huth, Paul, Balch-Lindsay, Dylan·2004·International Organization

Abstract

Why do some wars result in the intentional killing of large numbers of civilians? In this article we examine the incidence of mass killing in all wars from 1945 to 2000. In the statistical analysis of our data set of 147 wars, we find strong evidence supporting our hypothesis that mass killing is often a calculated military strategy used by regimes attempting to defeat major guerrilla insurgencies. Unlike conventional military forces, guerrilla armies often rely directly on the local civilian population for logistical support. Because guerrilla forces are difficult to defeat directly, governments facing major guerrilla insurgencies have strong incentives to target the guerrillas' civilian base of support. We find that mass killing is significantly more likely during guerrilla wars than during other kinds of wars. In addition, we find that the likelihood of mass killing among guerrilla conflicts is greatly increased when the guerrillas receive high levels of active support from the local population or when the insurgency poses a major military threat to the regime.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0020818304582061

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Governments facing guerrilla insurgencies are likely to target civilians in order to root out the rebels' popular support.

    “In particular, governments facing guerrilla insurgencies are likely to target civilians in order to root out the rebels' popular support (Valentino, Huth, and Balch-Lindsay 2004).”

    From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Valentino, Huth, and Balch-Lindsay 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valentino, B., Huth, P., & Balch-Lindsay, D.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
International Organization
Published
2004-04
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
375-407
ISSN
  • 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5088
OpenAlex
W2146280510
Cited by
676
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 31
FWCI
25.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Organization (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
mass murder, civilian casualties, guerrilla warfare, guerrilla insurgency, counterinsurgency, military strategy, war statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review