“Draining the Sea”: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare
Abstract
Why do some wars result in the intentional killing of large numbers of civilians? In this article we examine the incidence of mass killing in all wars from 1945 to 2000. In the statistical analysis of our data set of 147 wars, we find strong evidence supporting our hypothesis that mass killing is often a calculated military strategy used by regimes attempting to defeat major guerrilla insurgencies. Unlike conventional military forces, guerrilla armies often rely directly on the local civilian population for logistical support. Because guerrilla forces are difficult to defeat directly, governments facing major guerrilla insurgencies have strong incentives to target the guerrillas' civilian base of support. We find that mass killing is significantly more likely during guerrilla wars than during other kinds of wars. In addition, we find that the likelihood of mass killing among guerrilla conflicts is greatly increased when the guerrillas receive high levels of active support from the local population or when the insurgency poses a major military threat to the regime.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Governments facing guerrilla insurgencies are likely to target civilians in order to root out the rebels' popular support.
“In particular, governments facing guerrilla insurgencies are likely to target civilians in order to root out the rebels' popular support (Valentino, Huth, and Balch-Lindsay 2004).”
From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Valentino, Huth, and Balch-Lindsay 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
State Repression and Political Order
Davenport, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216 · Cited by 1,564 · see citing works
Monitoring Trends in Global Combat: A New Dataset of Battle Deaths
Lacina, B., & Gleditsch, N. P. (2005) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-005-6851-6 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control
Earl, J. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102609 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Dynamics and Logics of Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., & Vogt, M. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717721385 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Repression Technology: Internet Accessibility and State Violence
Gohdes, A. R. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12509 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Gohdes, A. R. (2015) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343314551398 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Sowers, J. L., Weinthal, E., & Zawahri, N. (2017) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010617716615 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Droughts, Land Appropriation, and Rebel Violence in the Developing World
Bagozzi, B. E., Koren, O., & Mukherjee, B. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/691057 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Loyle, C. E., & Appel, B. J. (2017) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqx045 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Living off the land: The connection between cropland, food security, and violence against civilians
Koren, O., & Bagozzi, B. E. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343316684543 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Repression in the Digital Age: Surveillance, Censorship, and the Dynamics of State Violence
Gohdes, A. R. (2024) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197743577.001.0001 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Hultquist, P. (2017) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/0738894215604972 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Nationwide shutdowns and government offensives
Gohdes, A. R. (2024) · Repression in the Digital Age · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197743577.003.0005
- Authors
- Valentino, B., Huth, P., & Balch-Lindsay, D.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- ORCID
- Valentino, Benjamin
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 375-407
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2146280510
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- mass murder, civilian casualties, guerrilla warfare, guerrilla insurgency, counterinsurgency, military strategy, war statistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review