The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High And Low Trusters' Responses To Fear in a Payoff Matrix
Abstract
Interpersonal trust has long been known to influence cooperation. This study tested the hypothesis that one's degree of trust in others will influence the extent to which one reacts to the presence of fear (or the possibility of receiving no payoff for cooperative actions) in a payoff matrix. The hypothesis was formally tested with public goods games and resource dilemma games, with fear manipulated. Results support the hypothesis: when fear was present, high trusters cooperated more frequently than low trusters; when absent, high and low trusters cooperated at the same rate. The findings held across both games. However, the effects of fear within each game were not straightforward: removing fear from the resource dilemma increased low trusters' cooperation rates, but removing fear from the public goods game decreased high trusters' cooperation rates. Results imply that discussion of the role of trust in cooperation must consider whether the particular dilemma contains an element of fear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Provision of step-level public goods: Effects of greed and fear of being gypped
Rapoport, A., & Eshed-Levy, D. (1989) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90012-5 · Cited by 174
Cited by
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000217 · Cited by 689
Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis.
Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030939 · Cited by 659
Managing Group Behavior: The Interplay Between Procedural Justice, Sense of Self, and Cooperation
De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37003-1 · Cited by 253
Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.124 · Cited by 227
When and how communicated guilt affects contributions in public good dilemmas
Wubben, M. J. J., De Cremer, D., & Dijk, E. V. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.015 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Parks, C. D., & Hulbert, L. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 718-730
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W2080619094
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High And Low Trusters' Responses To Fear in a Payoff Matrix. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022002795039004006
- The paper
- Parks, C. D., & Hulbert, L. G. (1995). High And Low Trusters' Responses To Fear in a Payoff Matrix. Journal of Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002795039004006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.