The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization
Abstract
Despite tendencies toward convergence, differences between individuals and groups continue to exist in beliefs, attitudes, and behavior. An agent-based adaptive model reveals the effects of a mechanism of convergent social influence. The actors are placed at fixed sites. The basic premise is that the more similar an actor is to a neighbor, the more likely that that actor will adopt one of the neighbor's traits. Unlike previous models of social influence or cultural change that treat features one at a time, the proposed model takes into account the interaction between different features. The model illustrates how local convergence can generate global polarization. Simulations show that the number of stable homogeneous regions decreases with the number of features, increases with the number of alternative traits per feature, decreases with the range of interaction, and (most surprisingly) decreases when the geographic territory grows beyond a certain size.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Discrete coverage as measured by Eq. ( 3) is also an accurate measure of polarization for Axelrod's Dissemination of Culture model precisely because it is categorical, even though he invokes some of the other concepts below when defining the term (Axelrod 1997).”
From Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures (2016) · cites this paper as Axelrod 1997
In the citing paper
“even though the traits of the agents are not cardinal values and therefore other measures would be required to quantify some aspects of the polarization.”
From Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures (2016) · cites this paper as Axelrod, 1997
In the citing paper
“In this case the groups are endogenously defined, and the more groups the greater the polarization.”
From Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures (2016) · cites this paper as Axelrod, 1997
In the citing paper
“In Axelrod's well-known model of the dissemination of culture, polarization is characterized by the appearance of regions which are internally homogeneous and have no attributes in common with the other internally homogeneous regions (Axelrod, 1997).”
From Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures (2016) · cites this paper as Axelrod, 1997
In the citing paper
“But it also requires group consensus and distinctness of the agents' traits.”
From Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures (2016) · cites this paper as Axelrod, 1997
In the citing paper
“Following the idea that we are more influenced by those similar to us, the node is then influenced as a function of the similarity with its interlocutors.”
From How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting (2022) · cites this paper as [104]
In the citing paper
“Previous modeling approaches describe segregation of opinions by influence based on similarity in the opinion space, either through a confidence bound [19, 20] or through homophily [21], the preference of agents to interact with similar individuals [22, 23].”
From Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“As such, the language model LLaMA recently gained attention for its relatively smaller size, making it more cost-effective to use 167 .”
From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [167]
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
Reid, A. J. S. (1985) · Pacific Affairs · doi:10.2307/2759245 · Cited by 25,964
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
The Interpretation of Cultures
Dadze-Arthur, A. F. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,510
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400820740 · Cited by 12,946
Duflo, E. (2019) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.109.612 · Cited by 11,235
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,854
Culture and the Evolutionary Process
Griesemer, J. R., Boyd, R. T., & Richerson, P. J. (1986) · Ornithological Applications · doi:10.2307/1367778 · Cited by 7,133
(1985) · American Economic Review · Cited by 6,056
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Abramson, J., The electronic commonwealth
- Bremer, S. A., Problems of world modeling
- Brown, T. A., European Conference on Artificial Life
- Coleman, J. S., Community conflict
- David, P. A., 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 332
- Deutsch, K. W., Nationalism and social communication: An inquiry in the foundations of nationality
- Deutsch, K. W., Nationalism and its alternatives
- Fukuyama, F., Trust
- Hannan, M. T., National development and the world system, 253
- Homans, G. C., The human group
- 10.2307/20045621 · DOI
- Kroeber, A. L., 1952, Papers of the Peabody Museum, 47, 643
- Lipset, S. M., Union democracy
- Putnam, R. D., 1995, Democracy, 6, 66
- Renfrew, C., The explanation of social influence: Models in prehistory
- Terrell, J., 1977, Fieldiana Anthropology, 68, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
Rahmandad, H., & Sterman, J. D. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.607302 · Cited by 17
Resisting hostility generated by terror: An agent-based study
Huet, S., Deffuant, G., Nugier, A., Streith, M., & Guimond, S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209907 · Cited by 16
Society, Mathematical Model of a Dynamical System of Conflict
Karataeva, T. V., & Koshmanenko, V. D. (2020) · Journal of Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10958-020-04803-3 · Cited by 16
A model of dynamic rewiring and knowledge exchange in R&D networks
Tomasello, M. V., Tessone, C. J., & Schweitzer, F. (2016) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.1142/s0219525916500041 · Cited by 16
Zhang, T., Dong, P., Zeng, Y., & Ju, Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.027 · Cited by 16
Banisch, S., & Shamon, H. (2023) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/00491241231186658 · Cited by 15
Mean field model of a game for power
Karataeva, T. V., Koshmanenko, V. D., Krawczyk, M. J., & KUŁAKOWSKI, K. (2019) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.110 · Cited by 17
Opinion diversity and social bubbles in adaptive Sznajd networks
Benatti, A., de Arruda, H. F., Silva, F. N., Comin, C. H., & Costa, L. D. F. (2020) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ab6de3 · Cited by 16
Balance seeking opinion dynamics model based on social judgment theory
Aghbolagh, H. D., Zamani, M., Паолини, С., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2020.132336 · Cited by 16
Segovia‐Martín, J., Walker, B., Fay, N., & Tamariz, M. (2020) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12852 · Cited by 20
The History of Agent-Based Modeling in the Social Sciences
Retzlaff, C. O., Ziefle, M., & Valdez, A. S. C. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77817-0_22 · Cited by 16
Modeling and managing collective cognitive convergence
Parunak, H. V. D., Belding, T. C., Hilscher, R., & Brueckner, S. (2008) · doi:10.5555/1402821.1402910 · Cited by 16
Swarm Intelligence for Analyzing Opinions in Online Communities
Kaiser, C., Kröckel, J., & Bodendorf, F. (2010) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2010.356 · Cited by 16
Effect of group organization on the performance of cooperative processes
Reia, S. M., & Fontanari, J. F. (2016) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.09.002 · Cited by 16
Deterministic models for opinion formation through communication: A survey
Abid, O., Jamoussi, S., & BenAyed, Y. (2018) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2018.02.002 · Cited by 16
MARKOV CHAIN AGGREGATION FOR SIMPLE AGENT-BASED MODELS ON SYMMETRIC NETWORKS: THE VOTER MODEL
Banisch, S., & Lima, R. (2015) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525915500113 · Cited by 16
Staged Models for Interdisciplinary Research
Lafuerza, L. F., Dyson, L., Edmonds, B., & McKane, A. J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157261 · Cited by 19
Metamimetic Games : Modeling Metadynamics in Social CognitionPreprint
Chavalarias, D. (2005) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.nlin/0508006 · Cited by 16
Bojić, L., Ilić, V., Prodanović, V., & Vuković, V. (2025) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-025-00326-x · Cited by 21
Eppstein, M. J., Rizzo, D. M., Lee, B., Krupa, J. S., & Manukyan, N. (2015) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2015.2427252 · Cited by 15
Signed Social Networks With Biased Assimilation
Wang, L., Hong, Y., Shi, G., & Altafini, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2021.3121221 · Cited by 15
Wuestenenk, N., van Tubergen, F., & Stark, T. (2022) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.04.001 · Cited by 15
Checking Simulations: Detecting and Avoiding Errors and Artefacts
Galán, J. M., Izquierdo, L. R., Izquierdo, S. S., Santos, J. I., del Olmo, R., & López‐Paredes, A. (2017) · Understanding complex systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66948-9_7 · Cited by 15
Zuckerman, A. S. (2007) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-007-0125-3 · Cited by 17
Fat-Tailed Fluctuations in the Size of Organizations: The Role of Social Influence
Mondani, H., Holme, P., & Liljeros, F. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100527 · Cited by 15
Simulation Analysis Using Multi-Agent Systems for Social Norms
Nishizaki, I., Katagiri, H., & Oyama, T. (2009) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-009-9170-x · Cited by 15
Kott, A., & Citrenbaum, G. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6235-5 · Cited by 24
Impact of centrality on cooperative processes
Reia, S. M., Herrmann, S., & Fontanari, J. F. (2017) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.95.022305 · Cited by 15
Mobility helps problem-solving systems to avoid groupthink
Gomes, P. F., Reia, S. M., Rodrigues, F. A., & Fontanari, J. F. (2019) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.99.032301 · Cited by 15
Shall We Riot Too? The Geographical Neighbor Impact on Political Instability
Grechyna, D. (2017) · Kyklos · doi:10.1111/kykl.12187 · Cited by 15
Jan Treur, A. (2019) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-019-0130-7 · Cited by 15
Opinion dynamics with emergent collective memory: A society shaped by its own past
Boschi, G., Cammarota, C., & Kühn, R. (2020) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2020.124909 · Cited by 14
Agreement threshold on Axelrod’s model of cultural dissemination
Carron, P. M., Maher, P. J., Fennell, S., Burke, K., Gleeson, J. P., Durrheim, K. L., & Quayle, M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233995 · Cited by 14
Quantifying knowledge exchange in R&D networks: a data-driven model
Vaccario, G., Tomasello, M. V., Tessone, C. J., & Schweitzer, F. (2018) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-018-0569-1 · Cited by 15
Dynamical Networks of Social Influence: Modern Trends and Perspectives
Anderson, B. D. O., Dabbene, F., Proskurnikov, A. V., Ravazzi, C., & Ye, M. (2020) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2684 · Cited by 15
Mathematical Modeling of Language Games
Loreto, V., Baronchelli, A., & Andrea Puglisi, B. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01250-1_15 · Cited by 15
Ito, S., Fujimura, S., & Tamiya, T. (2012) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2012.02.004 · Cited by 18
Dynamical phase transitions in Hegselmann-Krause model of opinion dynamics and consensus
Slanina, F. (2010) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-10568-y · Cited by 15
Optimal convergence in naming game with geography-based negotiation on small-world networks
Liu, R.-R., Wang, W.-X., Lai, Y., Chen, G., & Wang, B.-H. (2010) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2010.12.007 · Cited by 15
Parkinson’s Law quantified: three investigations on bureaucratic inefficiency
Klimek, P., Hanel, R., & Stefan Thurner, A. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2009/03/p03008 · Cited by 15
Opinion Spreading with Mobility on Scale-Free Networks
Qiang, G., Liu, J.-G., Wang, B.-H., Zhou, T., Xing-Wen, C., & Yao, Y. (2008) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/25/2/114 · Cited by 15
Agent based models of social systems and collective intelligence
Singh, V. K., & Gupta, A. K. (2009) · International Conference on Intelligent Agent & Multi-Agent Systems (IAMA) · doi:10.1109/iama.2009.5228085 · Cited by 15
Introduction: Agent-Based Modelling as a Tool to Advance Evolutionary Population Theory
Bavel, J. V., & Grow, A. (2016) · The Springer series on demographic methods and population analysis · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32283-4_1 · Cited by 15
Simulating ad-hoc demand-responsive transportation: a comparison of three approaches
Ronald, N., Thompson, R. G., & Winter, S. (2017) · Transportation Planning and Technology · doi:10.1080/03081060.2017.1283159 · Cited by 15
Continuum dynamics of the intention field under weakly cohesive social interaction
Degond, P., Liu, J., Merino-Aceituno, S., & Tardiveau, T. (2016) · Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences · doi:10.1142/s021820251740005x · Cited by 15
Can Extremism Guarantee Pluralism
Gargiulo, F. (2008) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · Cited by 15
Modelling linguistic taxonomic dynamics
Wichmann, S., Stauer, D., Lima, F. W. S., & Schulze, C. (2007) · Transactions of the Philological Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-968x.2007.00184.x · Cited by 15
AN ENERGY-BASED INTERACTION MODEL FOR POPULATION OPINION DYNAMICS WITH TOPIC COUPLING
Noorazar, H. (2017) · Research Exchange (Washington State University) · Cited by 15
LLM-AIDSim: LLM-Enhanced Agent-Based Influence Diffusion Simulation in Social Networks
Zhang, L., Hu, Y., Li, W., Bai, Q., & Nand, P. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13010029 · Cited by 20
How aggregated opinions shape beliefs
Oktar, K., & Lombrozo, T. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00398-7 · Cited by 17
Natural-Language Multi-Agent Simulations of Argumentative Opinion Dynamics
Betz, G. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.4725 · Cited by 19
The cultural impact on social cohesion: an agent-based modeling approach
Plikynas, D., Miliauskas, A., Laužikas, R., Dulskis, V., & Sakalauskas, L. L. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01293-6 · Cited by 17
Maksymov, I. S., & Pogrebna, G. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15070413 · Cited by 14
Six degrees of cultural diversity and R&D output efficiency
Tubadji, A., & Nijkamp, P. J. (2015) · Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12076-015-0155-1 · Cited by 14
Colloquium: Hierarchy of scales in language dynamics
Blythe, R. A. (2015) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2015-60347-3 · Cited by 15
When more of the same is better
Fontanari, J. F. (2016) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/113/28009 · Cited by 14
Jamieson, T. H., & Belle, D. A. V. (2018) · Political Science · doi:10.1080/00323187.2018.1476029 · Cited by 14
Drost, C. J., & Linden, M. V. (2018) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-018-9394-y · Cited by 14
Social Boundaries and Networks in the Diffusion of Innovations: a Short Introduction
Roux, V., & Manzo, G. (2018) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-018-9395-x · Cited by 14
Topical Alignment in Online Social Systems
Cardoso, F. M., Meloni, S., Santanchè, A., & Moreno, Y. (2017) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2019.00058 · Cited by 10
Learning to Reach Agreement in a Continuous Ultimatum Game
Jong, S. D., Uyttendaele, S., & Tuyls, K. (2015) · Cited by 14
Dong, J., Liu, R., Qiu, Y., & Crossan, M. M. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101477 · Cited by 14
Consensus in the Hegselmann–Krause Model
Lanchier, N., & Li, H. (2022) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-022-02920-8 · Cited by 14
Emotional Agents at the Square Lattice
Czaplicka, A., Chmiel, A., & Hołyst, J. A. (2010) · Acta Physica Polonica A · doi:10.12693/aphyspola.117.688 · Cited by 14
Voter model on a directed network: Role of bidirectional opinion exchanges
Han, S.-G., Um, J., & Kim, B. J. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.81.057103 · Cited by 14
Social interaction as a heuristic for combinatorial optimization problems
Fontanari, J. F. (2010) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.82.056118 · Cited by 14
INNOVATION AND SELF-ORGANIZATION IN A MULTI-AGENT MODEL
Araújo, T., & Mendes, R. V. (2009) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525909002180 · Cited by 14
Aguiar, F., & Parravano, A. (2013) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002713498708 · Cited by 14
Setting the agenda: Different strategies of a Mass Media in a model of cultural dissemination
Pinto, S., Balenzuela, P., & Dorso, C. O. (2016) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.04.024 · Cited by 14
Pulick, E., Korth, P., Grim, P., & Jung, J. (2016) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.3021 · Cited by 14
Effect of long-range interactions on the phase transition of Axelrod's model
Reia, S. M., & Fontanari, J. F. (2016) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.94.052149 · Cited by 14
An agent-based model of indirect minority influence on social change and diversity
Jung, J., Bramson, A., & Crano, W. D. (2017) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2017.1415961 · Cited by 14
Heylighen, F., Busseniers, E., Veitas, V., Vidal, C., & Weinbaum, D. R. (2012) · VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) · Cited by 14
Nonequilibrium phase transitions in a model with social influence of inflexible units
Jiang, L.-L., Hua, D.-Y., & Chen, T. (2007) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/37/005 · Cited by 14
Fame emerges as a result of small memory
Bingol, H. O. (2008) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.77.036118 · Cited by 14
Scaling limits for continuous opinion dynamics systems
Como, G., & Fagnani, F. (2009) · Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing · doi:10.1109/allerton.2009.5394488 · Cited by 14
Conventions spreading in open-ended systems
Brigatti, E., & Roditi, I. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023018 · Cited by 14
Opinion dynamics with confidence threshold: an alternative to the Axelrod modelPreprint
Lanchier, N. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1003.0115 · Cited by 14
Cultural evolution as a nonstationary stochastic process
Nicholson, A., & Sibani, P. (2015) · Complexity · doi:10.1002/cplx.21681 · Cited by 12
Global Optimization: A Soft Computing Perspective
Pal, R., Das, P., & Chattaraj, P. K. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00246 · Cited by 13
Mathematical modeling of disinformation and effectiveness of mitigation policies
Butts, D., Bollman, S. A., & Murillo, M. S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-45710-2 · Cited by 17
Dynamical model for competing opinions
Souza, S. R., & Gonçalves, S. (2012) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.85.056103 · Cited by 14
Tubadji, A., & Nijkamp, P. J. (2018) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.2018.1430948 · Cited by 13
Ahdanisa, D. S., & Rothman, S. B. (2020) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-020-00018-0 · Cited by 15
On the Design of Public Debate in Social Networks
Michel Grabisch, B., Mandel, A., & Rusinowska, A. (2022) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.2022.2356 · Cited by 15
Statistical Mechanics of Political Polarization
Kaufman, M., Kaufman, S., & Diep, H. T. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24091262 · Cited by 15
Polarization in the three-state q -voter model with anticonformity and bounded confidence
Lipiecki, A., & Sznajd-Weron, K. (2022) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112809 · Cited by 13
DIFFUSION PROCESSES THROUGH SOCIAL GROUPS' DYNAMICS
Apolloni, A., & Gargiulo, F. (2011) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525911003037 · Cited by 13
How inconsistency between attitude and behavior persists through cultural transmission
Sekiguchi, T., & Nakamaru, M. (2010) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.044 · Cited by 13
Multi‐agent model of group polarisation with biased assimilation of arguments
Liu, Q., Zhao, J., & Wang, X. (2014) · IET Control Theory and Applications · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0511 · Cited by 14
Impact of degree mixing pattern on consensus formation in social networks
Liu, X. F., & Tse, C. K. (2014) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2014.03.086 · Cited by 13
The Simmel effect and babies’ names
Krawczyk, M. J., Dydejczyk, A., & KUŁAKOWSKI, K. (2013) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2013.10.018 · Cited by 13
Agent‐based Computer Simulations of Language Choice Dynamics
Hadzibeganovic, T., Stauffer, D., & Schulze, C. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04507.x · Cited by 14
From Anti-Conformism to Extremism
Weisbuch, G. (2015) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.2825 · Cited by 13
Culture Outsmarts Nature in the Evolution of Cooperation
Cipriani, K. J. A. R. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 13
Jones, T., Beeton, S., & Cooper, M. J. M. (2018) · Journal of Ecotourism · doi:10.1080/14724049.2018.1503769 · Cited by 13
Mixing Dyadic and Deliberative Opinion Dynamics in an Agent‐Based Model of Group Decision‐Making
Butler, G., Pigozzi, G., & Rouchier, J. (2019) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2019/3758159 · Cited by 13
A Differential Game Model of Opinion Dynamics: Accord and Discord as Nash Equilibria
Niazi, M. U. B., & Özgüler, A. B. (2020) · Dynamic Games and Applications · doi:10.1007/s13235-020-00350-3 · Cited by 13
A Spatially Extended Model for Residential Segregation
Aguilera, A., & Ugalde, E. (2007) · Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society · doi:10.1155/2007/48589 · Cited by 13
On a framework for the prediction and explanation of changing opinions
Santos, E. E., Santos, E., Wilkinson, J. T., & Xia, H. (2009) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2009.5346294 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Axelrod, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Axelrod, Robert
- ORCID
- Axelrod, Robert
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-226
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W2151789396
- Semantic Scholar
- fb771ded31b3ee935a3458bdb469d6151505bd0b
- Cited by
- 1,918
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 64 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 84
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- cultural diffusion, social influence, cultural convergence, cultural change, agent-based modeling, adaptive models, polarization, local convergence, interaction range, multiple features
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
