Cited by 1,918Opinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceLanguage and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization

Axelrod, Robert·1997·Journal of Conflict Resolution

Abstract

Despite tendencies toward convergence, differences between individuals and groups continue to exist in beliefs, attitudes, and behavior. An agent-based adaptive model reveals the effects of a mechanism of convergent social influence. The actors are placed at fixed sites. The basic premise is that the more similar an actor is to a neighbor, the more likely that that actor will adopt one of the neighbor's traits. Unlike previous models of social influence or cultural change that treat features one at a time, the proposed model takes into account the interaction between different features. The model illustrates how local convergence can generate global polarization. Simulations show that the number of stable homogeneous regions decreases with the number of features, increases with the number of alternative traits per feature, decreases with the range of interaction, and (most surprisingly) decreases when the geographic territory grows beyond a certain size.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022002797041002001

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Abramson, J., The electronic commonwealth
  2. Bremer, S. A., Problems of world modeling
  3. Brown, T. A., European Conference on Artificial Life
  4. Coleman, J. S., Community conflict
  5. David, P. A., 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 332
  6. Deutsch, K. W., Nationalism and social communication: An inquiry in the foundations of nationality
  7. Deutsch, K. W., Nationalism and its alternatives
  8. Fukuyama, F., Trust
  9. Hannan, M. T., National development and the world system, 253
  10. Homans, G. C., The human group
  11. 10.2307/20045621 · DOI
  12. Kroeber, A. L., 1952, Papers of the Peabody Museum, 47, 643
  13. Lipset, S. M., Union democracy
  14. Putnam, R. D., 1995, Democracy, 6, 66
  15. Renfrew, C., The explanation of social influence: Models in prehistory
  16. Terrell, J., 1977, Fieldiana Anthropology, 68, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,918

Metadata

Authors
Axelrod, R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Axelrod, Robert
Venue
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Published
1997-04
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
203-226
ISSN
  • 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8766
OpenAlex
W2151789396
Cited by
1,918
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 84
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
cultural diffusion, social influence, cultural convergence, cultural change, agent-based modeling, adaptive models, polarization, local convergence, interaction range, multiple features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review