The Clash of Civilizations?: Originally published in Foreign Affairs 72 (3), 1993
Abstract
Conflict between civilizations will be the latest phase in the evolution of conflict in the modern world. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future. The interactions between peoples of different civilizations are increasing; these increasing interactions intensify civilization consciousness and awareness of differences between civilizations and commonalities within civilizations. The fault lines between civilizations are replacing the political and ideological boundaries of the Cold War as the flash points for crisis and bloodshed. Conflict along the fault line between Western and Islamic civilizations has been going on for 1,300 years. The interactions between civilizations vary greatly in the extent to which they are likely to be characterized by violence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization
Axelrod, R. (1997) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002797041002001 · Cited by 1,918 · see citing works
Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017 · Cited by 1,795 · see citing works
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Helbing, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12047 · Cited by 1,281 · see citing works
Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Nadler, A. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312440048 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Religion and contemporary sociological theories
Turner, B. S. (2014) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392114533214 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Threats and Alliances in the Middle East: Saudi and Syrian Policies in a Turbulent Region
Darwich, M. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108656689 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
God in the Game: Cosmopolitanism and Religious Conflict in Videogames
Wagner, R. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfs102 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ghaffar-Kucher, A., El-Haj, T. A., Ali, A., Fine, M., & Shirazi, R. (2022) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2021.1957491 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Imagining the Middle East: the state, nationalism and regional international society
Göl, A. (2015) · Global Discourse · doi:10.1080/23269995.2015.1053191 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Grossfeld, E. (2025) · International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence · doi:10.1080/08850607.2024.2330848 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Is There a Chinese Word for ‘Confucius’? A Review Article
Barrett, T. H. (1999) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x00017596 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huntington, S. P.
- Corresponding author
- Huntington, Samuel P.
- Venue
- Culture and Politics
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan US
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 99-118
- OpenAlex
- W2616324404
- Cited by
- 5,537
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 267 · 2023: 199 · 2022: 222 · 2021: 234 · 2020: 252 · 2019: 290 · 2018: 280 · 2017: 197 · 2016: 207 · 2015: 184 · 2014: 207 · 2013: 137 · 2012: 163
- FWCI
- 811.32
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Brill | Nijhoff eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Foreign Affairs (publishedVersion)
- Indiana University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) (submittedVersion)
- Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University) (submittedVersion)
- Foreign Affairs
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Globalization, Historical Perspectives, and International Relations
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global History, Politics, and Ideology
- Keywords
- clash of civilizations, intercultural conflict, Western civilization, Islamic civilization, fault lines, international politics, nation-state, Cold War, intercultural interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review