The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value Consensus and Importance: A Cross-National Study
Abstract
Societal value consensus has been widely discussed but rarely studied empirically. The authors developed a definition and an operational index for value consensus suitable for cross-national comparisons. They then generated and tested hypotheses concerning causal impacts of socioeconomic development and political democratization on both value importance and value consensus in a society. Data are from matched samples of teachers from 42 nations ( N = 7,856) who completed a survey that measures 10 distinct types of values. Both development and democratization correlate positively with the importance of openness and self-transcendence values, and negatively with the importance of conservation and self-enhancement values. Development and democratization have opposite relations to value consensus, suppressing one another’s effects. Development increases overall value consensus, whereas democratization decreases it. Differences between effects on specific value types are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,062
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Self-citationOutline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-6408 · Cited by 14,307
Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy
Stern, F., & Putnam, R. (1993) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20045657 · Cited by 11,137
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4135 · Cited by 7,983
Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition.
Ericson, J. E., & Dahl, R. A. (1972) · American Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2711442 · Cited by 7,203
Cited by
De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2007) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022107300278 · Cited by 631
Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States
Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0048 · Cited by 573
Chua, R. Y. J., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J.-F. (2015) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839214563595 · Cited by 433
Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: Effects of gender equality.
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015546 · Cited by 395
Self-citationPersonal Values’ Influence on the Ethical Dimension of Decision Making
Fritzsche, D., & Oz, E. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9256-5 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-497
- ISSN
- 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5422
- OpenAlex
- W2158922542
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value Consensus and Importance: A Cross-National Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022022100031004003
- The paper
- Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G. (2000). Value Consensus and Importance: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031004003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
