Cited by 573Generational Differences and TrendsCultural Differences and ValuesGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management

Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States

Egri, Carolyn P., Ralston, David A.·2004·Organization Science

Abstract

This study investigated the generation cohort value orientations of 774 Chinese and 784 U.S. managers and professionals. The three Chinese generations (Consolidation, Cultural Revolution, Social Reform) since the establishment of Communist China were significantly more open to change and self-enhancement but less conservative and self-transcendent than the Republican Era generation. The value orientations of U.S. generations (Generation X, Baby Boomer, Silent generation) followed an age-related pattern with the exception of self-transcendence values. The least similar value orientations were between Chinese and U.S. generations that had grown up during Communist China's closed-door policy. The more entrepreneurial value orientations of the most recent Chinese generations appear to be compatible with organizational changes currently under way in China's state-owned sector.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1030.0048

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is practically impossible to define generations in each country based on each country's unique historical and political experiences when the sample includes more than 10 countries.

    “Such an approach would work in a single or two-country study (e.g., Egri & Ralston, 2004), but it is practically impossible to define generations in each country based on each country’s unique historical and political experiences when the sample includes more than 10 countries.”

    From Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart (2018) · cites this paper as Egri & Ralston, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2004-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
210-220
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2126374572
Cited by
573
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 26
FWCI
91.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Dalian University of Technology
  • Universidade de Macau
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Keywords
generational cohorts, personal values, value orientations, self-transcendence, self-enhancement, conservatism, entrepreneurial values, cross-cultural comparison, state-owned enterprises, organizational change, People's Republic of China, Generation X, baby boomers, Silent Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review