Cited by 366Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionCultural Differences and ValuesMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Self-Concordance and Subjective Well-Being in Four Cultures

Sheldon, Kennon M., Elliot, Andrew J., Ryan, Richard M., Chirkov, Valery, Kim, Youngmee, Wu, Cindy, Demir, Meliksah, Sun, Zhigang·2004·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

Sheldon and colleagues have recently focused research attention on the concept of self-concordance, in which people feel that they pursue their goals because the goals fit with their underlying interests and values rather than because others say they should pursue them. Self-concordant individuals typically evidence higher subjective well-being (SWB). But is this also true in non-Western cultures, which emphasize people’s duty to conform to societal expectations and group-centered norms? To address this question, this study assessed goal self-concordance and SWB in four different cultures. U.S., Chinese, and South Korean samples evidenced equal levels of self-concordance, whereas a Taiwanese sample evidenced somewhat less self-concordance. More importantly, self-concordance predicted SWB within every culture. It appears that “owning one’s actions”—that is, feeling that one’s goals are consistent with the self—may be important for most if not all humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022022103262245

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Ryan, R. M., Chirkov, V., Kim, Y., Wu, C., Demir, M., & Sun, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
  • Wayne State University
  • University of Missouri-Columbia
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
2004-03
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
209-223
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
OpenAlex
W2158224326
Cited by
366
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
self-concordance, subjective well-being, cross-cultural comparison, goal pursuit, values and interests, group norms, Chinese, South Koreans, Taiwanese

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review