The Culturally Intelligent Team: The Impact of Team Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Heterogeneity on Team Shared Values
Abstract
This study examines how the cultural heterogeneity of work teams moderates the way in which team cultural intelligence (CQ) affects the development of team shared values. Utilizing the four-factor model of CQ, we predict how each facet of CQ will impact the development of shared values in relatively early stages of team development differently for culturally homogeneous versus culturally heterogeneous work teams. We operationalize team shared values as the degree to which a broad set of cultural values are similarly endorsed by team members as guiding principles when working in their team. Results show that behavioral and metacognitive CQ had a positive effect on shared values in culturally heterogeneous teams; however, motivational and metacognitive CQ had a negative effect on shared values in culturally homogeneous teams. All effects were observed in the early stages of team development. Having uncovered positive and negative effects of CQ for shared values in work teams, we discuss implications for theory and practice around this form of cultural competence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such metacognition shapes responsiveness to cues that help predict the process that is likely to become dominant in the diverse team.
“Such metacognition, which can be cultivated by organizational diversity practices (Nishii et al., 2018), shapes responsiveness to cues that help predict the process that is likely to become dominant in the diverse team (Adair, Hideg, & Spence, 2013;Johnson, Lenartowicz, & Apud, 2006).”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Adair, Hideg, & Spence, 2013
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019 · see citing works
Cross-cultural competence in international business: toward a definition and a model
Johnson, J. P., Lenartowicz, T., & Apud, S. (2006) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400205 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Partnering Across Borders: Negotiating Organizational Culture in a German-Japanese Joint Venture
Brannen, M. Y., & Salk, J. E. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700534001 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adair, W. L., Hideg, I., & Spence, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-07-15
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 941-962
- ISSN
- 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5422
- OpenAlex
- W2123845521
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 26.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- cultural heterogeneity, team development, cultural competence, behavioral cultural intelligence, metacognitive cultural intelligence, motivational cultural intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review