Cited by 55Gender Studies in LanguageMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingGender and Feminist Studies

Gender-Fair Language in Job Advertisements: A Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Analysis

Hodel, Lea, Formanowicz, Magdalena, Sczesny, Sabine, Valdrová, Jana, von Stockhausen, Lisa·2017·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

The present study investigates whether and how the use of gender-fair language is related to linguistic, cultural, and socioeconomic differences between countries with grammatical gender languages. To answer this question, we analyzed job titles in online job advertisements from four European countries differing in achieved gender equality and egalitarian versus hierarchical cultural values (Switzerland, Austria, Poland, and Czech Republic). Results show that gender-fair job titles were more frequent in more egalitarian countries with higher levels of socioeconomic gender equality (Switzerland, Austria) than in countries with a higher acceptance of hierarchies and inequalities (Poland, Czech Republic). In the latter countries, gender-specific (masculine or feminine) job titles predominated. Moreover, gender-fair job titles were more prevalent in a female-dominated branch (health care) and a gender-balanced economic branch (food services) than in a male-dominated branch (constructional steel and metal work). Thus, our findings suggest that the language use in job advertisements indeed corresponds with linguistic, cultural, and socioeconomic aspects and may contribute to the transmission of gender (in)equalities and gender stereotypes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022022116688085

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Hodel et al. (2017), job postings in German-speaking countries were more likely to employ gender-inclusive wording than those in Slavic-speaking countries.

    “Results show that job postings in the German-speaking countries were more likely to employ gender-inclusive wording than those in Slavic-speaking countries.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodel, L., Formanowicz, M., Sczesny, S., Valdrová, J., & von Stockhausen, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Corresponding author
Sczesny, Sabine
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
2017-02-02
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
384-401
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
OpenAlex
W2585278765
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
gender-inclusive language, job advertisements, job titles, grammatical gender, gender equality, cultural values, egalitarianism, gender stereotypes, gender inequality, cross-national comparison, health care, food service, construction industry, gender and language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review